mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012933.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "182",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 182 of 261 1343\nLC6Cmax5 McHugh - cross\n1 A. Correct.\n2 Q. So even though the account is under the name of Ghislaine Maxwell, this statement can't tell us whether Ghislaine Maxwell actually approved or had anything to do with that transaction?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And now I want you to look at that same exhibit starting at page 5.\n5 A. Same statement?\n6 Q. The same statement, but I want you to now go to page 5, which we didn't look at on direct examination. Do you see that page?\n7 A. I do.\n8 Q. That has a canceled check on it; right?\n9 A. Yes, a check date.\n10 Q. And let's go to the next page, page 6. That also has a series of paid checks on that page; right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And that's typical with account statements, when they're sent to the account holder, they include the checks that were drawn on the account for that month; right?\n13 A. Especially at that time, yes.\n14 Q. So these reflect checks that were drawn on the account in that month in the statement of June of 2007; right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Now let's look at just the first three of those checks on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012933",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 182 of 261 1343",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC6Cmax5 McHugh - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. Correct.\n2 Q. So even though the account is under the name of Ghislaine Maxwell, this statement can't tell us whether Ghislaine Maxwell actually approved or had anything to do with that transaction?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And now I want you to look at that same exhibit starting at page 5.\n5 A. Same statement?\n6 Q. The same statement, but I want you to now go to page 5, which we didn't look at on direct examination. Do you see that page?\n7 A. I do.\n8 Q. That has a canceled check on it; right?\n9 A. Yes, a check date.\n10 Q. And let's go to the next page, page 6. That also has a series of paid checks on that page; right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And that's typical with account statements, when they're sent to the account holder, they include the checks that were drawn on the account for that month; right?\n13 A. Especially at that time, yes.\n14 Q. So these reflect checks that were drawn on the account in that month in the statement of June of 2007; right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Now let's look at just the first three of those checks on",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012933",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "June of 2007"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012933"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains a reference number 'DOJ-OGR-00012933'."
}