mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012938.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "187",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 187 of 261 1348\nLC6Cmax5\nMcHugh - redirect\n1 Q. Just a few followup questions for you, Mr. McHugh.\n2 We looked at a number of transactions in your direct\n3 testimony and on cross examination from some of these accounts;\n4 correct?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. There is nothing on the face of these documents that\n7 suggests in any way that any of these transactions was\n8 improper; isn't that right?\n9 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Overruled.\n11 A. I don't know the nature of the transactions.\n12 Q. But the statements themselves don't indicate anything on\n13 their face of any kind of improper activity?\n14 A. No, I don't think so.\n15 MR. EVERDELL: No further questions, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: Ms. Moe.\n17 MS. MOE: Very briefly, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n19 BY MS. MOE:\n20 Q. Mr. McHugh, you were asked some questions on cross\n21 examination about account ownership documents. Do you remember\n22 being asked questions about that?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. I'd just like to ask you to turn in the binder in front of\n25 you to what's marked for identification as Government Exhibit\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012938",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 187 of 261 1348",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC6Cmax5\nMcHugh - redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Just a few followup questions for you, Mr. McHugh.\n2 We looked at a number of transactions in your direct\n3 testimony and on cross examination from some of these accounts;\n4 correct?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. There is nothing on the face of these documents that\n7 suggests in any way that any of these transactions was\n8 improper; isn't that right?\n9 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Overruled.\n11 A. I don't know the nature of the transactions.\n12 Q. But the statements themselves don't indicate anything on\n13 their face of any kind of improper activity?\n14 A. No, I don't think so.\n15 MR. EVERDELL: No further questions, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: Ms. Moe.\n17 MS. MOE: Very briefly, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n19 BY MS. MOE:\n20 Q. Mr. McHugh, you were asked some questions on cross\n21 examination about account ownership documents. Do you remember\n22 being asked questions about that?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. I'd just like to ask you to turn in the binder in front of\n25 you to what's marked for identification as Government Exhibit",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012938",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. McHugh",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012938"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}