mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013000.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "249",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 249 of 261 1410 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct 1 THE COURT: They are what were found in the Epstein home. 2 MS. MENNINGER: They could be altered documents found 3 within his home, but they're being offered for the truth of the 4 matter in the photograph, that is that there was a close 5 relationship between the two of them, as the government just 6 argued. 7 8 THE COURT: Overruled. 9 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, with respect to the next 10 document, it doesn't show any relationship. It's a single 11 person. 12 THE COURT: Overruled. It's found in the home of 13 Mr. Epstein. 14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, with respect to other 15 individuals who haven't testified about the dates on which 16 these photographs were taken or the ages at which they were 17 taken, I don't think that there has been any foundation lead to 18 show that those individuals -- that the photographs are what 19 they purport to be. As I said, they came from a photo shop 20 document file, which means they are, in fact, in a program that 21 is meant to alter photographs. 22 THE COURT: Overruled. 23 MS. MENNINGER: And with respect to the totality of 24 them, your Honor, there is a cumulativeness problem. You don't 25 need 20 photographs to say what two might just as well say. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013000",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 249 of 261 1410 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: They are what were found in the Epstein home. 2 MS. MENNINGER: They could be altered documents found 3 within his home, but they're being offered for the truth of the 4 matter in the photograph, that is that there was a close 5 relationship between the two of them, as the government just 6 argued. 7 8 THE COURT: Overruled. 9 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, with respect to the next 10 document, it doesn't show any relationship. It's a single 11 person. 12 THE COURT: Overruled. It's found in the home of 13 Mr. Epstein. 14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, with respect to other 15 individuals who haven't testified about the dates on which 16 these photographs were taken or the ages at which they were 17 taken, I don't think that there has been any foundation lead to 18 show that those individuals -- that the photographs are what 19 they purport to be. As I said, they came from a photo shop 20 document file, which means they are, in fact, in a program that 21 is meant to alter photographs. 22 THE COURT: Overruled. 23 MS. MENNINGER: And with respect to the totality of 24 them, your Honor, there is a cumulativeness problem. You don't 25 need 20 photographs to say what two might just as well say.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013000",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013000"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}