mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013001.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "250",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 250 of 261 1411 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct 1 MS. MOE: On that score, your Honor, throughout this trial, the defense has repeatedly tried to distance Ms. Maxwell from Mr. Epstein and his affairs and argue that things were compartmentalized. I believe in the cross examination of some witnesses, they repeatedly suggested that she was only a personal assistant. These photographs show their close relationship throughout time and are directly relevant. There is nothing cumulative about that. In fact, it speaks directly to one of the issues at the heart of this case, and for that reason, these photographs are certainly relevant. MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure how they show time, your Honor. There are no date stamps on the photographs. MS. MOE: Your Honor, given the change in hairstyles, the people in the photographs are clearly aging throughout time, I think that relationship and its duration throughout time is evident from the photographs themselves. THE COURT: Overruled. Anything else? MS. MENNINGER: As to all, your Honor, including the testifying witnesses? THE COURT: I'm sorry. MS. MENNINGER: Including as to the testifying witnesses -- THE COURT: What exhibit number? MS. MENNINGER: The first one, your Honor, I referred SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 250 of 261 1411 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: On that score, your Honor, throughout this trial, the defense has repeatedly tried to distance Ms. Maxwell from Mr. Epstein and his affairs and argue that things were compartmentalized. I believe in the cross examination of some witnesses, they repeatedly suggested that she was only a personal assistant. These photographs show their close relationship throughout time and are directly relevant. There is nothing cumulative about that. In fact, it speaks directly to one of the issues at the heart of this case, and for that reason, these photographs are certainly relevant. MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure how they show time, your Honor. There are no date stamps on the photographs. MS. MOE: Your Honor, given the change in hairstyles, the people in the photographs are clearly aging throughout time, I think that relationship and its duration throughout time is evident from the photographs themselves. THE COURT: Overruled. Anything else? MS. MENNINGER: As to all, your Honor, including the testifying witnesses? THE COURT: I'm sorry. MS. MENNINGER: Including as to the testifying witnesses -- THE COURT: What exhibit number? MS. MENNINGER: The first one, your Honor, I referred",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}