DOJ-OGR-00013004.json 4.0 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "253",
  4. "document_number": "751",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 253 of 261 1414 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct exists. And I also would like to say with respect to 309, we litigated whether or not we could put in evidence photographs of this witness, and the government called us, I think it was slut shaming when I tried to argue that there were other photographs of this individual that were much like this that she had put out in newspapers, and now they want to put on a photo of her after she's gotten off the stand and not afforded us the opportunity to cross examine her about similar photographs that she has put out. MS. MODE: Your Honor, I'm surprised by all three of those arguments. THE COURT: Let's start with 332. Is the government's representation that the individual depicted in this photo is a minor at the time of the photo? MS. MODE: Your Honor, we made no representations about the metadata of the file of this photo. To be short, in direct, I don't know. There will be testimony at this trial and there has been testimony at this trial that this person was victimized as a minor. In terms of the particular date of this photograph, we're limited by the information we have in the metadata. I believe it's for this reason that the defense had noticed perhaps a metadata expert and the defense will be free to explore that issue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013004",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 253 of 261 1414 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "exists. And I also would like to say with respect to 309, we litigated whether or not we could put in evidence photographs of this witness, and the government called us, I think it was slut shaming when I tried to argue that there were other photographs of this individual that were much like this that she had put out in newspapers, and now they want to put on a photo of her after she's gotten off the stand and not afforded us the opportunity to cross examine her about similar photographs that she has put out.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "MS. MODE: Your Honor, I'm surprised by all three of those arguments.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "THE COURT: Let's start with 332. Is the government's representation that the individual depicted in this photo is a minor at the time of the photo?",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "MS. MODE: Your Honor, we made no representations about the metadata of the file of this photo. To be short, in direct, I don't know. There will be testimony at this trial and there has been testimony at this trial that this person was victimized as a minor. In terms of the particular date of this photograph, we're limited by the information we have in the metadata. I believe it's for this reason that the defense had noticed perhaps a metadata expert and the defense will be free to explore that issue.",
  35. "position": "main"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013004",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [],
  50. "organizations": [
  51. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  52. ],
  53. "locations": [],
  54. "dates": [
  55. "08/10/22"
  56. ],
  57. "reference_numbers": [
  58. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  59. "751",
  60. "309",
  61. "332",
  62. "DOJ-OGR-00013004"
  63. ]
  64. },
  65. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  66. }