mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013211.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "198",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 198 of 264 1639 LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross things that are in the complaint. THE COURT: So that's a long way of getting to my -- responding to my first question. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. THE COURT: What paragraph is inconsistent? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell -- THE COURT: Point me to a paragraph. MR. PAGLIUCA: All of the paragraphs, your Honor. THE COURT: On the same theory you just pronounced? MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. THE COURT: So then on your second theory, can you point to any inconsistency? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, these are all omissions, your Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has testified now that she was the subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that. Paragraph 9, I think, is an expansion. We have only Kellen, often calling -- excuse me. 11A is what I'm looking at. THE COURT: So other than the omission theory, is there an inconsistency you're pointing to? MR. PAGLIUCA: No. THE COURT: Is there any other? I understand your omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second, I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013211",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 198 of 264 1639",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "things that are in the complaint. THE COURT: So that's a long way of getting to my -- responding to my first question. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. THE COURT: What paragraph is inconsistent? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell -- THE COURT: Point me to a paragraph. MR. PAGLIUCA: All of the paragraphs, your Honor. THE COURT: On the same theory you just pronounced? MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. THE COURT: So then on your second theory, can you point to any inconsistency? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, these are all omissions, your Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has testified now that she was the subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that. Paragraph 9, I think, is an expansion. We have only Kellen, often calling -- excuse me. 11A is what I'm looking at. THE COURT: So other than the omission theory, is there an inconsistency you're pointing to? MR. PAGLIUCA: No. THE COURT: Is there any other? I understand your omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second, I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013211",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Kellen",
      "Ms. Comey",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013211"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and MR. PAGLIUCA regarding inconsistencies in a complaint. The transcript is from a court case with the reference number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, document 753."
}