mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013219.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "206",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 206 of 264 1647 LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross 1 this is inconsistent because we're not -- we're not talking about 2001, we're talking about 2002. 3 THE COURT: Right. But it doesn't specify -- she testified to incidents like these in 2002, and so it's just not -- tell me how it's inconsistent with that testimony. 5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, you know, for the second time in 6 July of 2002 -- 7 THE COURT: No, it doesn't say that. 8 9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Paragraph 39 is what I'm looking at. 10 THE COURT: Oh, you told me 33. I am a lot of things, 11 but I am not a mind reader. I sustained on 33. 12 I will go to 39. Go ahead. 13 MR. PAGLIUCA: So for the second time in July of 2002. 14 This is -- 15 THE COURT: I mean, that reads like more than one 16 incident in July of 2002. 17 MR. PAGLIUCA: The second, not a third, not a fourth. 18 THE COURT: For the second time. Okay. 19 MR. PAGLIUCA: And when we get through all of this, 20 the other inconsistency that tracks all of these is there is no 21 allegation of sexual intrusion or penetration. Every single 22 one of these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks, 23 every single one. And so we have new testimony about the acts 24 that were allegedly performed. 25 THE COURT: All right. Ms. Comey, do you want to  SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013219",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 206 of 264 1647 LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 this is inconsistent because we're not -- we're not talking about 2001, we're talking about 2002. 3 THE COURT: Right. But it doesn't specify -- she testified to incidents like these in 2002, and so it's just not -- tell me how it's inconsistent with that testimony. 5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, you know, for the second time in 6 July of 2002 -- 7 THE COURT: No, it doesn't say that. 8 9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Paragraph 39 is what I'm looking at. 10 THE COURT: Oh, you told me 33. I am a lot of things, 11 but I am not a mind reader. I sustained on 33. 12 I will go to 39. Go ahead. 13 MR. PAGLIUCA: So for the second time in July of 2002. 14 This is -- 15 THE COURT: I mean, that reads like more than one 16 incident in July of 2002. 17 MR. PAGLIUCA: The second, not a third, not a fourth. 18 THE COURT: For the second time. Okay. 19 MR. PAGLIUCA: And when we get through all of this, 20 the other inconsistency that tracks all of these is there is no 21 allegation of sexual intrusion or penetration. Every single 22 one of these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks, 23 every single one. And so we have new testimony about the acts 24 that were allegedly performed. 25 THE COURT: All right. Ms. Comey, do you want to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013219",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Comey",
      "PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2001",
      "2002",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "39",
      "33",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013219"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}