DOJ-OGR-00013274.json 3.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "261",
  4. "document_number": "753",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 264 1702 LC7Cmax8\n1 I'm just completing out the record here, which is the question does not call for a privilege communication. It's a yes-or-no answer. Yes, I was shown materials. I don't believe that's privileged because there is no communication required, number 1.\n2 Number 2, in the event those materials are shown to the government in a meeting, they lose any putative privilege that they may have.\n3 Number 3, to the extent that they're intended to be communicated to a third party, they are not privileged to begin with, even if they're not shown to the third party. I believe that's the status of the law and that's my record. Thank you.\n4 THE COURT: Again, you might have been able to get there, but the question that you asked, I sustained on privilege.\n5 Next, anything?\n6 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor. Thank you.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Was there another issue you wanted to make a record on, Mr. Pagliuca?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't think --\n10 THE COURT: If it occurs to you, you can make it in the morning.\n11 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.\n12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n13 DOJ-OGR-00013274",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 264 1702 LC7Cmax8",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 I'm just completing out the record here, which is the question does not call for a privilege communication. It's a yes-or-no answer. Yes, I was shown materials. I don't believe that's privileged because there is no communication required, number 1.\n2 Number 2, in the event those materials are shown to the government in a meeting, they lose any putative privilege that they may have.\n3 Number 3, to the extent that they're intended to be communicated to a third party, they are not privileged to begin with, even if they're not shown to the third party. I believe that's the status of the law and that's my record. Thank you.\n4 THE COURT: Again, you might have been able to get there, but the question that you asked, I sustained on privilege.\n5 Next, anything?\n6 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor. Thank you.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Was there another issue you wanted to make a record on, Mr. Pagliuca?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't think --\n10 THE COURT: If it occurs to you, you can make it in the morning.\n11 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013274",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. MOE",
  36. "MR. EVERDELL",
  37. "MR. PAGLIUCA"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  41. "DOJ"
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [],
  44. "dates": [
  45. "08/10/22"
  46. ],
  47. "reference_numbers": [
  48. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  49. "753",
  50. "DOJ-OGR-00013274"
  51. ]
  52. },
  53. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  54. }