mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013288.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 262 1715 LC8Cmax1 to do with the operation of the Trump company or Mar-a-Lago. The relevance is extraordinarily remote as there is nothing to tie in the relationship or to suggest that Virginia Roberts was at Mar-a-Lago during the period of time that Juan Alessi claims to have seen her. There are no employment records for her and there is nothing in the record to suggest anything concerning her father. THE COURT: So is it a relevance objection? MS. STERNHEIM: It's relevance as well as foundation as a business record. THE COURT: Okay. MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose beginning with the relevance objection, your Honor. The relevance for these documents arises in three respects. First of all - and this is an initial matter - Sky Roberts, the evidence already in the case shows that there is a Virginia Roberts with a father named Sky Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate. So these documents are relevant to connect the Virginia Roberts in the birth certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in the area of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000 which allows the jury to draw the inference that that is the Virginia Roberts who has been the subject of testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi and others. So these records both corroborate the fact that there was a Virginia Roberts with an association of Mar-a-Lago at the relevant time and corroborate and provide corroboration that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013288",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 262 1715 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "to do with the operation of the Trump company or Mar-a-Lago. The relevance is extraordinarily remote as there is nothing to tie in the relationship or to suggest that Virginia Roberts was at Mar-a-Lago during the period of time that Juan Alessi claims to have seen her. There are no employment records for her and there is nothing in the record to suggest anything concerning her father. THE COURT: So is it a relevance objection? MS. STERNHEIM: It's relevance as well as foundation as a business record. THE COURT: Okay. MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose beginning with the relevance objection, your Honor. The relevance for these documents arises in three respects. First of all - and this is an initial matter - Sky Roberts, the evidence already in the case shows that there is a Virginia Roberts with a father named Sky Roberts, as shown on her birth certificate. So these documents are relevant to connect the Virginia Roberts in the birth certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in the area of Mar-a-Lago in the year 2000 which allows the jury to draw the inference that that is the Virginia Roberts who has been the subject of testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi and others. So these records both corroborate the fact that there was a Virginia Roberts with an association of Mar-a-Lago at the relevant time and corroborate and provide corroboration that",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013288",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Virginia Roberts",
      "Juan Alessi",
      "Sky Roberts",
      "Carolyn",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Trump company",
      "Mar-a-Lago",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Mar-a-Lago"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013288"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}