mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013290.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "12",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 262 1717 LC8Cmax1\n\n1 copies.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the fact that somebody fills out a request for insurance does not deem it a business record.\n3 It is not related to the course of business of the Mar-a-Lago property, and the government is trying, through a backdoor method, to draw an inference that because a person named Virginia Roberts was insured by a man named Sky Roberts, that she was, one, employed by Mar-a-Lago or, two, was at Mar-a-Lago. Insurance does not support that.\n4\n5 THE COURT: Nothing in these records appears support that she was employed at Mar-a-Lago.\n6\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: The government agrees, your Honor, these records don't give rise to that.\n8\n9 THE COURT: But you're trying to show that?\n10\n11 MR. ROHRBACH: That she was the dependent of a Mar-a-Lago employee.\n12\n13 On the insurance point, I would note that Sky Roberts was not an outsider to Mar-a-Lago at the time he filled out the employee benefits forms. He was an employee of Mar-a-Lago, and one of the things Mar-a-Lago does is provide benefits to its employees.\n14\n15 THE COURT: And then on the business records, your argument, Ms. Sternheim, is that because it's a form filled out by Mar-a-Lago employees for the purposes of insurance that's provided by another entity, that they're not a Mar-a-Lago\n16\n17 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00013290",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 262 1717 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013290",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 copies.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the fact that somebody fills out a request for insurance does not deem it a business record.\n3 It is not related to the course of business of the Mar-a-Lago property, and the government is trying, through a backdoor method, to draw an inference that because a person named Virginia Roberts was insured by a man named Sky Roberts, that she was, one, employed by Mar-a-Lago or, two, was at Mar-a-Lago. Insurance does not support that.\n4\n5 THE COURT: Nothing in these records appears support that she was employed at Mar-a-Lago.\n6\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: The government agrees, your Honor, these records don't give rise to that.\n8\n9 THE COURT: But you're trying to show that?\n10\n11 MR. ROHRBACH: That she was the dependent of a Mar-a-Lago employee.\n12\n13 On the insurance point, I would note that Sky Roberts was not an outsider to Mar-a-Lago at the time he filled out the employee benefits forms. He was an employee of Mar-a-Lago, and one of the things Mar-a-Lago does is provide benefits to its employees.\n14\n15 THE COURT: And then on the business records, your argument, Ms. Sternheim, is that because it's a form filled out by Mar-a-Lago employees for the purposes of insurance that's provided by another entity, that they're not a Mar-a-Lago",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "Virginia Roberts",
      "Sky Roberts",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Mar-a-Lago",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013290"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}