mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013293.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "15",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/2022",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 262 1720 LC8Cmax1\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: I believe the government is putting those in evidence; is that correct? Are you going to be moving those into evidence?\n2 THE COURT: 823 and 824.\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, I am.\n4 MS. STERNHEIM: You can hold onto them if you would like. I imagine they'll be putting them on the screen.\n5 THE COURT: I'll keep them for now then. Thank you.\n6 (Recess)\n7 THE COURT: We have one juror who had a substantial train issue and had to back up and revert, who called worried that they were late and we said just get here safely. So we're not quite ready with all the jurors yet.\n8 Mr. Rohrbach, you know that case, United States v. Lieberman?\n9 MR. ROHRBACH: I am not familiar with that case, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: It's pretty much directly on point, I think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of 823 and 824. Let me give you the cite. It is United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980).\n11 Do you have any reason to think that the witness would testify that the employer does anything to verify the information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?\n12 MR. ROHRBACH: First of all, for 823, your Honor,\n13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n14 DOJ-OGR-00013293",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 262 1720 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013293",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: I believe the government is putting those in evidence; is that correct? Are you going to be moving those into evidence?\n2 THE COURT: 823 and 824.\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, I am.\n4 MS. STERNHEIM: You can hold onto them if you would like. I imagine they'll be putting them on the screen.\n5 THE COURT: I'll keep them for now then. Thank you.\n6 (Recess)\n7 THE COURT: We have one juror who had a substantial train issue and had to back up and revert, who called worried that they were late and we said just get here safely. So we're not quite ready with all the jurors yet.\n8 Mr. Rohrbach, you know that case, United States v. Lieberman?\n9 MR. ROHRBACH: I am not familiar with that case, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: It's pretty much directly on point, I think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of 823 and 824. Let me give you the cite. It is United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980).\n11 Do you have any reason to think that the witness would testify that the employer does anything to verify the information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?\n12 MR. ROHRBACH: First of all, for 823, your Honor,",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1980"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "823",
      "824",
      "637 F.2d 95",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013293"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}