mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013299.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "21",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 262 1726 LC8Cmax1\narticulated a theory like that with regard to this record, but the testimony for Government Exhibit 761 was that the school received the record, integrated it into its files, and relied on it for its admissions decisions, which are a regular function and practice of the school. So it would come in as a business record under that line of cases.\nMS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, they didn't rely on the financial guarantor piece of it, which is what the government is offering for the truth of the matter asserted therein, and that's the piece that we object to. If they want to redact that piece, I would renew my objection to the admission of that and take out the piece that they're offering that was not verified by the school --\nTHE COURT: I'm telling you my rationale at the time for ruling on the objection was that -- the relevance was that the family at the time was indicating that -- whether it's true or not, but that Mr. Epstein was providing financial assistance.\nMS. MENNINGER: If it was admitted for a limited purpose then, your Honor, I would ask that there be some type of instruction given -- we can take up at the charging conference about the purposes for which that document can be considered by the jury.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I just want to make sure that the Court is aware, whereas I don't object to the admission as\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013299",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 262 1726 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "articulated a theory like that with regard to this record, but the testimony for Government Exhibit 761 was that the school received the record, integrated it into its files, and relied on it for its admissions decisions, which are a regular function and practice of the school. So it would come in as a business record under that line of cases.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, they didn't rely on the financial guarantor piece of it, which is what the government is offering for the truth of the matter asserted therein, and that's the piece that we object to. If they want to redact that piece, I would renew my objection to the admission of that and take out the piece that they're offering that was not verified by the school --",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I'm telling you my rationale at the time for ruling on the objection was that -- the relevance was that the family at the time was indicating that -- whether it's true or not, but that Mr. Epstein was providing financial assistance.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: If it was admitted for a limited purpose then, your Honor, I would ask that there be some type of instruction given -- we can take up at the charging conference about the purposes for which that document can be considered by the jury.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I just want to make sure that the Court is aware, whereas I don't object to the admission as",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013299",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013299"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}