mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013352.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "74",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 262 1779\nLC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct\n1 hearsay objection. Here, this witness --\n2 THE COURT: Just to be specific, there is not an\n3 objection to the ones that she personally took. Can you\n4 identify those, of the numbers.\n5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I just want to doublecheck\n6 the exhibits I want to doublecheck them in the binder. I\n7 think they are 1B, 2C, 3P, and 3X. I just want to doublecheck\n8 that I have that right.\n9 THE COURT: The 2 series is already in?\n10 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: So of the ones that you're offering?\n12 MS. MOE: 1B, 3P, and 3X.\n13 Just so I understand the issue, because it seems to\n14 now be overlapping, I'm not sure why there would be a business\n15 records objection to records other than those that this\n16 employee took. I'm not sure if that's an authentication\n17 question --\n18 THE COURT: No. I think, as I understand it, we need\n19 a custodian who indicates the foundation for the exception.\n20 The record was made at or near the time by or from information\n21 transmitted by someone with knowledge. The record was kept in\n22 the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business,\n23 organization, occupation, or calling, whether or not for\n24 profit. Making your record was a regular practice of that\n25 activity.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013352",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 262 1779",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 hearsay objection. Here, this witness --\n2 THE COURT: Just to be specific, there is not an\n3 objection to the ones that she personally took. Can you\n4 identify those, of the numbers.\n5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I just want to doublecheck\n6 the exhibits I want to doublecheck them in the binder. I\n7 think they are 1B, 2C, 3P, and 3X. I just want to doublecheck\n8 that I have that right.\n9 THE COURT: The 2 series is already in?\n10 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: So of the ones that you're offering?\n12 MS. MOE: 1B, 3P, and 3X.\n13 Just so I understand the issue, because it seems to\n14 now be overlapping, I'm not sure why there would be a business\n15 records objection to records other than those that this\n16 employee took. I'm not sure if that's an authentication\n17 question --\n18 THE COURT: No. I think, as I understand it, we need\n19 a custodian who indicates the foundation for the exception.\n20 The record was made at or near the time by or from information\n21 transmitted by someone with knowledge. The record was kept in\n22 the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business,\n23 organization, occupation, or calling, whether or not for\n24 profit. Making your record was a regular practice of that\n25 activity.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013352",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013352",
      "1B",
      "2C",
      "3P",
      "3X"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}