mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013534.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "256",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 262 1967 LC8VMAX8\n1 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, to be frank, we do -- the government has shaved a considerable amount of its case off in the last day. And we have witness issues. People are traveling. We had been budgeting that we would start our case the following week after the three-day break, simply because we thought, given the number of witnesses that were left, that we would be maybe even going into the following week before the defense case started.\n2 So given that they have now trimmed their case significantly in the last day, we are trying to hustle witnesses. It's not that easy. So our strong preference, your Honor, would be that if we can start the defense case the following -- I'm sorry, Thursday of the following week. So we would fill up Friday with the charge conference, if the Court isn't -- if we want to do it at a later time, we can also do that. But we prefer not to start the defense case until --\n3 THE COURT: Right. I think we've come around to the request, which is given the expedition of the government's case, your request is to start the defense case, whatever it looks like, on Thursday when we return.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: That is the request, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: And so if we can use this Friday for the charging conference, we could do that or we could do the charging conference on the evening of the 16th.\n6 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.\n7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013534",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 262 1967 LC8VMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, to be frank, we do -- the government has shaved a considerable amount of its case off in the last day. And we have witness issues. People are traveling. We had been budgeting that we would start our case the following week after the three-day break, simply because we thought, given the number of witnesses that were left, that we would be maybe even going into the following week before the defense case started.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 So given that they have now trimmed their case significantly in the last day, we are trying to hustle witnesses. It's not that easy. So our strong preference, your Honor, would be that if we can start the defense case the following -- I'm sorry, Thursday of the following week. So we would fill up Friday with the charge conference, if the Court isn't -- if we want to do it at a later time, we can also do that. But we prefer not to start the defense case until --",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3 THE COURT: Right. I think we've come around to the request, which is given the expedition of the government's case, your request is to start the defense case, whatever it looks like, on Thursday when we return.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4 MR. EVERDELL: That is the request, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5 THE COURT: And so if we can use this Friday for the charging conference, we could do that or we could do the charging conference on the evening of the 16th.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013534",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "16th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013534"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}