mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013535.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "257",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 262 1968 LC8VMAX8\n1\nTHE COURT: Or if you think your case will last through Friday, if the parties are interested in the Saturday offer.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nWe defer to the Court with respect to timing. And it may perhaps just depend on the sequencing and timing of how things pan out tomorrow or Friday morning.\nWe would just note with respect to sequencing, the Court has ordered the defense to produce Rule 26.2 disclosures at the conclusions -- at the conclusion of the government's case. And so we would respectfully request those materials again at the conclusion of our case, irrespective of the timing of the beginning of the defense case.\nTHE COURT: Yes. So that will either be tomorrow or Friday, it sounds like.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nMR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor. Understood.\nTHE COURT: All right. Okay. That's helpful.\nI'm comfortable with the defense request in light of the speed with which we've moved and my scheduling conflict, to -- since that takes us through till Thursday, to let the defense begin its case on Thursday, assuming the government is finished, of course. And I'll think about whether this Friday\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013535",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 262 1968 LC8VMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1\nTHE COURT: Or if you think your case will last through Friday, if the parties are interested in the Saturday offer.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nWe defer to the Court with respect to timing. And it may perhaps just depend on the sequencing and timing of how things pan out tomorrow or Friday morning.\nWe would just note with respect to sequencing, the Court has ordered the defense to produce Rule 26.2 disclosures at the conclusions -- at the conclusion of the government's case. And so we would respectfully request those materials again at the conclusion of our case, irrespective of the timing of the beginning of the defense case.\nTHE COURT: Yes. So that will either be tomorrow or Friday, it sounds like.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nMR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor. Understood.\nTHE COURT: All right. Okay. That's helpful.\nI'm comfortable with the defense request in light of the speed with which we've moved and my scheduling conflict, to -- since that takes us through till Thursday, to let the defense begin its case on Thursday, assuming the government is finished, of course. And I'll think about whether this Friday",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013535",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "tomorrow",
      "Friday",
      "Thursday",
      "Saturday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013535",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}