mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013558.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "757",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 49 1990 LC9VMAXT\n\n1 that -- and, as I said, I wanted to have agreement from both\n2 sides on it. But the reason not to do that would be if we\n3 might get to closings before the following Monday. And that's\n4 why it's really -- because if we will get to closings before\n5 the following Monday, the charge needs to be done before then.\n6 MS. STERNHEIM: Of course. And we will update the\n7 government and the Court with regard to scheduling.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 So I think if there's a chance that the defense either\n10 won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should\n11 do the charge conference Thursday night. So that's the\n12 question.\n13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Okay.\n15 Does the government have any preference or views on\n16 that?\n17 MR. ROHRBACH: The government has no preference. That\n18 makes sense to us. Thank you, your Honor.\n19 THE COURT: Okay. Great. Yes.\n20 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, in connection with the defense\n21 case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the\n22 subpoena to Mr. Glassman.\n23 THE COURT: Yes. I was looking at that last night as\n24 well. And I have a question and a little bit of a proposal,\n25 see if we can get back to a magical moment. It's a difficult\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013558",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 49 1990 LC9VMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that -- and, as I said, I wanted to have agreement from both sides on it. But the reason not to do that would be if we might get to closings before the following Monday. And that's why it's really -- because if we will get to closings before the following Monday, the charge needs to be done before then. MS. STERNHEIM: Of course. And we will update the government and the Court with regard to scheduling. THE COURT: Okay. So I think if there's a chance that the defense either won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should do the charge conference Thursday night. So that's the question. MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. Does the government have any preference or views on that? MR. ROHRBACH: The government has no preference. That makes sense to us. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. Great. Yes. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, in connection with the defense case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the subpoena to Mr. Glassman. THE COURT: Yes. I was looking at that last night as well. And I have a question and a little bit of a proposal, see if we can get back to a magical moment. It's a difficult",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013558",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "Mr. Glassman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "757",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013558"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}