mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013594.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 267 2030 LCACmax1\n\n1 copies on the subset of exhibits by letter, and you'll move those, as well.\n2\n3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: I guess my question, your Honor, is what's going --\n5\n6 THE COURT: Hang on a second.\n7 MR. PAGLIUCA: -- to the jury is really the question.\n8 My belief, when we address this with the witness, was the government was not offering the entirety of 52, the government\n9 was offering the photocopies of the various pages, and that was the exhibit that was being admitted to the jury, and that's, I\n10 think, a significant distinction here.\n11\n12 THE COURT: So you're opposing movement of the --\n13 obviously, you've objected. To any event, I've overruled, but even after that, you have an objection to moving the whole\n14 thing to the jury or you just think it's inconsistent with how it's been discussed or I suppose inconsistent with how it was\n15 discussed at the time it was moved?\n16\n17 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. We had this colloquy. The government simply moved to admit the -- I think it's five\n18 pages. That was the extent of the admission. My suggestion, because we were dealing with the foundation issues, was that we\n19 would have that exhibit, we would agree to the copies being admitted per the government's request, but I wanted the actual\n20 exhibit as part of the record for any necessary appellate\n21\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013594",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 267 2030 LCACmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 copies on the subset of exhibits by letter, and you'll move those, as well.\n2\n3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: I guess my question, your Honor, is what's going --\n5\n6 THE COURT: Hang on a second.\n7 MR. PAGLIUCA: -- to the jury is really the question.\n8 My belief, when we address this with the witness, was the government was not offering the entirety of 52, the government\n9 was offering the photocopies of the various pages, and that was the exhibit that was being admitted to the jury, and that's, I\n10 think, a significant distinction here.\n11\n12 THE COURT: So you're opposing movement of the --\n13 obviously, you've objected. To any event, I've overruled, but even after that, you have an objection to moving the whole\n14 thing to the jury or you just think it's inconsistent with how it's been discussed or I suppose inconsistent with how it was\n15 discussed at the time it was moved?\n16\n17 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. We had this colloquy. The government simply moved to admit the -- I think it's five\n18 pages. That was the extent of the admission. My suggestion, because we were dealing with the foundation issues, was that we\n19 would have that exhibit, we would agree to the copies being admitted per the government's request, but I wanted the actual\n20 exhibit as part of the record for any necessary appellate\n21",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013594",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013594"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}