DOJ-OGR-00013662.json 3.6 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "71",
  4. "document_number": "759",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 267 2099\nLCAVMAX2\nA. Farmer - direct\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Can you explain.\n3 A. Yeah. I think most people probably can understand that\n4 it's not the kind of thing that you would want -- I mean, it\n5 sort of feels like a shameful memory and is not the kind of\n6 thing you want a lot of attention on. But at a certain point,\n7 I felt compelled because I, you know --\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Narrative, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled.\n10 A. I wanted to -- if I could help there be any accountability\n11 or these people being stopped in some way, it felt like it was\n12 worth it, even if it was uncomfortable.\n13 Q. Did there come a time when you were interviewed by law\n14 enforcement in New York?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Approximately when was that?\n17 A. That was in 2019, I believe, in the late summer/early fall.\n18 Q. Since that time, have you been interviewed by the\n19 government?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Approximately how many times have you met with the\n22 government?\n23 A. I'd say approximately five or six times.\n24 Q. Did there come a time when you sued Maxwell and Epstein?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013662",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 267 2099",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LCAVMAX2\nA. Farmer - direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Can you explain.\n3 A. Yeah. I think most people probably can understand that\n4 it's not the kind of thing that you would want -- I mean, it\n5 sort of feels like a shameful memory and is not the kind of\n6 thing you want a lot of attention on. But at a certain point,\n7 I felt compelled because I, you know --\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Narrative, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled.\n10 A. I wanted to -- if I could help there be any accountability\n11 or these people being stopped in some way, it felt like it was\n12 worth it, even if it was uncomfortable.\n13 Q. Did there come a time when you were interviewed by law\n14 enforcement in New York?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Approximately when was that?\n17 A. That was in 2019, I believe, in the late summer/early fall.\n18 Q. Since that time, have you been interviewed by the\n19 government?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Approximately how many times have you met with the\n22 government?\n23 A. I'd say approximately five or six times.\n24 Q. Did there come a time when you sued Maxwell and Epstein?\n25 A. Yes.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013662",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Farmer",
  41. "Menninger",
  42. "Maxwell",
  43. "Epstein"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  47. ],
  48. "locations": [
  49. "New York"
  50. ],
  51. "dates": [
  52. "08/10/22",
  53. "2019"
  54. ],
  55. "reference_numbers": [
  56. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  57. "759",
  58. "DOJ-OGR-00013662"
  59. ]
  60. },
  61. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  62. }