mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013695.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "104",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 104 of 267 2132\nLCACmax3 A. Farmer - cross\n1 again, there is no mention of Ghislaine Maxwell; correct?\n2 A. That's right.\n3 Q. And this, what we've been looking at, is only a portion of\n4 your January 7th journal entry; right?\n5 A. Right.\n6 Q. But you have no reason to believe Ghislaine Maxwell is\n7 mentioned in the rest of the entry that we don't have?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. I want to talk about the next journal entry, which I\n10 believe is Government Exhibit 604.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: And we may have the same issue, but\n12 I'll try to be sensitive to it, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n14 Q. This one is dated January 25th of 1996; right?\n15 A. Right.\n16 Q. And that's about three weeks after the last one; right?\n17 A. Yeah.\n18 Q. And were there any entries between January 6th and January\n19 25th?\n20 A. I don't believe so.\n21 Q. And when you wrote this entry a few weeks later, you wanted\n22 to go back and fill in some details that you hadn't mentioned\n23 the first time; right?\n24 A. Right.\n25 Q. And that's when you wrote about go going to see a play\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013695",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 104 of 267 2132",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCACmax3 A. Farmer - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 again, there is no mention of Ghislaine Maxwell; correct?\n2 A. That's right.\n3 Q. And this, what we've been looking at, is only a portion of\n4 your January 7th journal entry; right?\n5 A. Right.\n6 Q. But you have no reason to believe Ghislaine Maxwell is\n7 mentioned in the rest of the entry that we don't have?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. I want to talk about the next journal entry, which I\n10 believe is Government Exhibit 604.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: And we may have the same issue, but\n12 I'll try to be sensitive to it, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n14 Q. This one is dated January 25th of 1996; right?\n15 A. Right.\n16 Q. And that's about three weeks after the last one; right?\n17 A. Yeah.\n18 Q. And were there any entries between January 6th and January\n19 25th?\n20 A. I don't believe so.\n21 Q. And when you wrote this entry a few weeks later, you wanted\n22 to go back and fill in some details that you hadn't mentioned\n23 the first time; right?\n24 A. Right.\n25 Q. And that's when you wrote about go going to see a play",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013695",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "January 7th",
      "January 25th of 1996",
      "January 6th",
      "January 25th",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "604",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013695"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}