mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013746.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "155",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 155 of 267 2183 LCAVMAX6\n\n1    A. Farmer - cross\n2    THE COURT: Where are we looking?\n3    MS. MENNINGER: The bottom third of the page, I think.\n4    If we could call that out and expand it for everyone's benefit.\n5    Q. You recall speaking with the government and the agents on May 9th of 2020, right, Ms. Farmer?\n6    A. Yes.\n7    Q. And you described for them this massage that you're talking about now, right?\n8    A. Yes.\n9    Q. And what you told the agents and the government in May of 2020 is that the body massage was awkward and uncomfortable, but not explicitly sexual; correct?\n10   A. I don't believe those are my words; I think that's what's noted here. It says no touching of nipples, genitals, etc., and I did clarify that, but that did not happen.\n11   Q. \"Not explicitly sexual\" is what you said; correct?\n12   MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.\n13   THE COURT: Sustained.\n14   Q. Is it your belief that the prosecutor wrote that down wrong in May of --\n15   MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n16   THE COURT: Sustained.\n17   Q. You talked about during this massage you had a sense that Epstein would be able to see you; correct?\n18   A. Correct.\n19   SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n20   DOJ-OGR-00013746",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 155 of 267 2183 LCAVMAX6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Farmer - cross",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Where are we looking?\nMS. MENNINGER: The bottom third of the page, I think.\nIf we could call that out and expand it for everyone's benefit.\nQ. You recall speaking with the government and the agents on May 9th of 2020, right, Ms. Farmer?\nA. Yes.\nQ. And you described for them this massage that you're talking about now, right?\nA. Yes.\nQ. And what you told the agents and the government in May of 2020 is that the body massage was awkward and uncomfortable, but not explicitly sexual; correct?\nA. I don't believe those are my words; I think that's what's noted here. It says no touching of nipples, genitals, etc., and I did clarify that, but that did not happen.\nQ. \"Not explicitly sexual\" is what you said; correct?\nMS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Sustained.\nQ. Is it your belief that the prosecutor wrote that down wrong in May of --\nMS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\nTHE COURT: Sustained.\nQ. You talked about during this massage you had a sense that Epstein would be able to see you; correct?\nA. Correct.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013746",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Farmer",
      "Epstein",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May 9th, 2020",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013746"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}