mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013790.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "199",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 199 of 267 2227 LCACmax7 A. Farmer - redirect MS. MENNINGER: For that reason, having her explain what sexualized means when I wasn't allowed to elicit to the agents that it wasn't sexualized is what gives me concern. THE COURT: The record stands and you inquired. I didn't prohibit you from asking her, I didn't let her explain what sexualized means either. I've made my record and the record stands as it is. You can't go back in time. MS. MENNINGER: That's right. THE COURT: What is the issue? Should I send the jury for a break or? MS. STERNHEIM: If this would probably be a good time for a break before they call him, but I can make it very quickly. THE COURT: Go ahead. MS. STERNHEIM: It's my understanding that Dave Mulligan is being called as a witness for prior inconsistent statements. THE COURT: Right. MS. STERNHEIM: The 3500 material that has been provided far exceeds the testimony of this witness, and I just want to make sure that it is not going to exceed as far as prior consistent what she's testified to. MS. POMERANTZ: I'm happy to consult with Ms. Sternheim on a break. My plan is to ask specific questions that would be consistent with what she's testified about. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013790",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 199 of 267 2227 LCACmax7 A. Farmer - redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: For that reason, having her explain what sexualized means when I wasn't allowed to elicit to the agents that it wasn't sexualized is what gives me concern. THE COURT: The record stands and you inquired. I didn't prohibit you from asking her, I didn't let her explain what sexualized means either. I've made my record and the record stands as it is. You can't go back in time. MS. MENNINGER: That's right. THE COURT: What is the issue? Should I send the jury for a break or? MS. STERNHEIM: If this would probably be a good time for a break before they call him, but I can make it very quickly. THE COURT: Go ahead. MS. STERNHEIM: It's my understanding that Dave Mulligan is being called as a witness for prior inconsistent statements. THE COURT: Right. MS. STERNHEIM: The 3500 material that has been provided far exceeds the testimony of this witness, and I just want to make sure that it is not going to exceed as far as prior consistent what she's testified to. MS. POMERANTZ: I'm happy to consult with Ms. Sternheim on a break. My plan is to ask specific questions that would be consistent with what she's testified about.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013790",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Dave Mulligan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "2227",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013790"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}