mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013834.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "243",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 243 of 267 2271 L CAVMAX8\n1 Counts One and Two, the enticement conspiracy and substantive counts.\n2\n3 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n4 Mr. Rohrbach.\n5 MR. ROHRBACH: If I may take the podium, your Honor.\n6 Your Honor, the Court should deny the defendant's\n7 motion as to Counts One and Two.\n8 Jane was not in New York by accident. In fact,\n9 there's no nonsexualized purpose that's been articulated at\n10 this point for Jane to travel to New York.\n11 Mr. Everdell takes a very narrow view on the nexus\n12 that's required between enticement, inducement, and the other\n13 verbs that are in the enticement statute and the travel itself.\n14 The jury could readily conclude, as the government has argued,\n15 that all of Jane's travel to New York was in the context of the\n16 relationship that the defendant and Epstein built with Jane.\n17 That meets each of the verbs in the statute.\n18 Jane's testimony is that the defendant played on her\n19 hopes and dreams to make her feel special, seen, and cared for.\n20 \"Enticement\" is defined as using hope and desire. So the\n21 defendant was playing on Jane's hopes and desires in order to\n22 get her into this relationship over a multi-year period in\n23 which she was traveling with the defendant.\n24 Similarly, persuasion, the defendant testified that --\n25 sorry, Jane testified that the defendant developed a friendship\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 243 of 267 2271 L CAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Counts One and Two, the enticement conspiracy and substantive counts.\n2\n3 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n4 Mr. Rohrbach.\n5 MR. ROHRBACH: If I may take the podium, your Honor.\n6 Your Honor, the Court should deny the defendant's\n7 motion as to Counts One and Two.\n8 Jane was not in New York by accident. In fact,\n9 there's no nonsexualized purpose that's been articulated at\n10 this point for Jane to travel to New York.\n11 Mr. Everdell takes a very narrow view on the nexus\n12 that's required between enticement, inducement, and the other\n13 verbs that are in the enticement statute and the travel itself.\n14 The jury could readily conclude, as the government has argued,\n15 that all of Jane's travel to New York was in the context of the\n16 relationship that the defendant and Epstein built with Jane.\n17 That meets each of the verbs in the statute.\n18 Jane's testimony is that the defendant played on her\n19 hopes and dreams to make her feel special, seen, and cared for.\n20 \"Enticement\" is defined as using hope and desire. So the\n21 defendant was playing on Jane's hopes and desires in order to\n22 get her into this relationship over a multi-year period in\n23 which she was traveling with the defendant.\n24 Similarly, persuasion, the defendant testified that --\n25 sorry, Jane testified that the defendant developed a friendship",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}