mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013835.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "244",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 267 2272 LCAVMAX8 with her, talked about sex with her, bought her gifts, took her on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many years. But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce, and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact, it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan, given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute is met. And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013835",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 267 2272 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "with her, talked about sex with her, bought her gifts, took her on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many years. But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce, and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact, it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan, given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute is met. And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013835",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013835"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and a defendant who is accused of enticing or coercing a minor, referred to as 'Jane', to travel to New York for sexual abuse. The text is typed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps on the page."
}