mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013847.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "256",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 267 2284 LCAVMAX8\n1 number of exhibits, both defense exhibits and government exhibits, that need additional redactions. And we agreed over\n2 the break we would work diligently to resolve the full slate of pending redactions issues. We don't understand the particular\n3 urgency with respect to these exhibits.\n4 Ms. Menninger is right, that she did email the government last night in the evening while, as the Court is aware, we were tending to other matters. I don't understand\n5 the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits. And again, we conferred with the defense this morning to confirm they would resolve all the pending redaction issues over the\n6 weekend. That seems entirely reasonable, given how many redaction issues we'll be resolving.\n7 We're still waiting to hear from the defense on a number of redactions and we'll work together on that issue. I don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this\n8 evening; and so I think the proposal we discussed this morning is reasonable. We're going to get those issued resolved in full.\n9 THE COURT: We'll get all of that done this weekend. Thank you.\n10 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: The attorney-client privilege issue.\n12 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think we very well may be able to reach some type of stipulation, as your Honor\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013847",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 267 2284 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 number of exhibits, both defense exhibits and government exhibits, that need additional redactions. And we agreed over\n2 the break we would work diligently to resolve the full slate of pending redactions issues. We don't understand the particular\n3 urgency with respect to these exhibits.\n4 Ms. Menninger is right, that she did email the government last night in the evening while, as the Court is aware, we were tending to other matters. I don't understand\n5 the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits. And again, we conferred with the defense this morning to confirm they would resolve all the pending redaction issues over the\n6 weekend. That seems entirely reasonable, given how many redaction issues we'll be resolving.\n7 We're still waiting to hear from the defense on a number of redactions and we'll work together on that issue. I don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this\n8 evening; and so I think the proposal we discussed this morning is reasonable. We're going to get those issued resolved in full.\n9 THE COURT: We'll get all of that done this weekend. Thank you.\n10 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: The attorney-client privilege issue.\n12 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think we very well may be able to reach some type of stipulation, as your Honor",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013847",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013847"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}