mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013852.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "261",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 267 2289 LCAVMAX8\n\nOur concern is that the jury might feel we don't want to come back and would rush to judgment in a case that we know they were prepared to be here until the middle of January. And they are already getting some time off. They may be disinclined to want to come back. And that could inure to the disadvantage of both parties, I understand.\n\nBut I think we would not want to be in a position where the jury basically had one day prior to Christmas holiday, and I would ask the Court to be mindful of that, as I am sure you are. And that was one of the reasons why early on when we were hopeful that we could begin this case earlier because of our concern that it was going to bump up, now clearly we are way ahead of what the schedule is. But I would ask the Court to take into consideration that concern that we have.\n\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Moe?\n\nMS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing of deliberations, I think the request on the timing of deliberations is, I think, at best, premature because we don't know how long the defense case will be; and so I don't think the Court needs to reach that now.\n\nBut as a preview, if we end up in a situation in which the defense rests during the week of the 20th, I think we should be respectful of the jury's time. There's no reason for the jury not to be permitted to deliberate. I think it would\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 267 2289 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Our concern is that the jury might feel we don't want to come back and would rush to judgment in a case that we know they were prepared to be here until the middle of January. And they are already getting some time off. They may be disinclined to want to come back. And that could inure to the disadvantage of both parties, I understand.\n\nBut I think we would not want to be in a position where the jury basically had one day prior to Christmas holiday, and I would ask the Court to be mindful of that, as I am sure you are. And that was one of the reasons why early on when we were hopeful that we could begin this case earlier because of our concern that it was going to bump up, now clearly we are way ahead of what the schedule is. But I would ask the Court to take into consideration that concern that we have.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Moe?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing of deliberations, I think the request on the timing of deliberations is, I think, at best, premature because we don't know how long the defense case will be; and so I don't think the Court needs to reach that now.\n\nBut as a preview, if we end up in a situation in which the defense rests during the week of the 20th, I think we should be respectful of the jury's time. There's no reason for the jury not to be permitted to deliberate. I think it would",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "20th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "261",
      "267",
      "2289"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about the timing of jury deliberations. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps."
}