mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013853.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "262",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 267 2290 LCAVMAX8\n1 be a hardship to keep them indefinitely and have them come back\n2 and wait a week to deliberate on a case that's ready to be\n3 adjudicated.\n4 So, again, I don't think the Court needs to reach this\n5 issue given the timing; but if the jury was prepared to sit\n6 this entire week and hear evidence, there's no reason they\n7 couldn't also be here and be deliberating. I think we should\n8 be respectful of the jury's time. And dismissing them for yet\n9 another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the\n10 efficient way the Court has run this trial. And if this case\n11 can be resolved --\n12 THE COURT: Well, thank you. That's not what they\n13 usually call it.\n14 MS. MOE: And I think, you know, the best way to be\n15 respectful of the jurors' time is to let them have the case.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. It's premature. We'll see where we\n17 are. My thinking was -- I think we'll see where we are.\n18 I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging\n19 conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to\n20 turn to closings the day following the completion of the\n21 evidence. We'll see where that is and the like. But I don't\n22 want to keep starting and stopping. So we'll use our time, but\n23 I'm mindful of your concern, Ms. Sternheim, and we'll see where\n24 we are.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: I would just like to add that we\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013853",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 267 2290 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 be a hardship to keep them indefinitely and have them come back\n2 and wait a week to deliberate on a case that's ready to be\n3 adjudicated.\n4 So, again, I don't think the Court needs to reach this\n5 issue given the timing; but if the jury was prepared to sit\n6 this entire week and hear evidence, there's no reason they\n7 couldn't also be here and be deliberating. I think we should\n8 be respectful of the jury's time. And dismissing them for yet\n9 another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the\n10 efficient way the Court has run this trial. And if this case\n11 can be resolved --\n12 THE COURT: Well, thank you. That's not what they\n13 usually call it.\n14 MS. MOE: And I think, you know, the best way to be\n15 respectful of the jurors' time is to let them have the case.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. It's premature. We'll see where we\n17 are. My thinking was -- I think we'll see where we are.\n18 I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging\n19 conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to\n20 turn to closings the day following the completion of the\n21 evidence. We'll see where that is and the like. But I don't\n22 want to keep starting and stopping. So we'll use our time, but\n23 I'm mindful of your concern, Ms. Sternheim, and we'll see where\n24 we are.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: I would just like to add that we",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013853",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "18th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013853"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}