mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013855.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "264",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 264 of 267 2292 LCAVMAX8\n\ninformation about the rebuttal case, we have noticed -- we have noticed a potential rebuttal expert. Whether or not we end up calling the expert we can't determine without seeing the defense case first. But that's the full scope of what we've noticed at this juncture. And I'm not sure whether or not we would call that expert. It would depend entirely on the defense case. So that's the scope of what we're discussing.\n\nAgain, with respect to timing, we'll take it as it comes. And I think the Court has noted that this issue is premature, but we just wanted to assure the Court the government will be prepared to close the day after the conclusion of the defense case and would very much like to move forward.\n\nWith respect to closings, we did want to just preview that -- and we plan to work with the defense on this issue. But we wanted to start thinking ahead the mechanics of how closings would work, given the fact that there are sealed exhibits and some public exhibits.\n\nAnd so we've started thinking through that, but wanted to just flag that that's a mechanical issue that we'll want to work through with the defense so that everyone has an opportunity to present what they need to without any hiccups, and also so that the jury can see exhibits without them being shown publicly. And so we'll work with the defense on that choreography to make sure that that runs smoothly. And we'll\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013855",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 264 of 267 2292 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "information about the rebuttal case, we have noticed -- we have noticed a potential rebuttal expert. Whether or not we end up calling the expert we can't determine without seeing the defense case first. But that's the full scope of what we've noticed at this juncture. And I'm not sure whether or not we would call that expert. It would depend entirely on the defense case. So that's the scope of what we're discussing.\n\nAgain, with respect to timing, we'll take it as it comes. And I think the Court has noted that this issue is premature, but we just wanted to assure the Court the government will be prepared to close the day after the conclusion of the defense case and would very much like to move forward.\n\nWith respect to closings, we did want to just preview that -- and we plan to work with the defense on this issue. But we wanted to start thinking ahead the mechanics of how closings would work, given the fact that there are sealed exhibits and some public exhibits.\n\nAnd so we've started thinking through that, but wanted to just flag that that's a mechanical issue that we'll want to work through with the defense so that everyone has an opportunity to present what they need to without any hiccups, and also so that the jury can see exhibits without them being shown publicly. And so we'll work with the defense on that choreography to make sure that that runs smoothly. And we'll",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013855",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013855"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}