mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013868.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 246 2304 LCGVMAX1 1 could, the cover letter. Do we know why it's dated 2010? 2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think that's a separate 3 record. Because I think that record reflects that there was an 4 opportunity to purchase the leasehold outright in 2010. It's a 5 little bit of a complicated title. It's actually a leasehold. 6 She does own the lease; it's effectively owning it, but this 7 land, I think, has been in the possession of the Duke of 8 Westminster since, you know, 1500. It's a very complicated 9 chain of title in the UK. 10 But the way it works is you pass the leasehold from 11 one person to another. And that is effective ownership under 12 the land registry records. And that leasehold passed in -- the 13 contracts were exchanged in '96, and the deal closed in '97, in 14 January '97; and it was registered in a land registry as a 15 transfer of that title in March of '97. 16 THE COURT: And again, my question is not that it's to 17 prove when Ms. Maxwell purchased the home, but the defense's 18 proffer from counsel is that it is to prove that she did not 19 live there before 1996? 20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right. We have a witness, Kate, 21 who says -- she didn't live there before 1997, because that's 22 when she actually took possession of the property, right. 23 We have a witness, Kate, who has testified to events 24 that allegedly took place in the Kinnerton Street property in 25 '94 and '95. And these records show that she didn't own that  SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013868",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 246 2304 LCGVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013868",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 could, the cover letter. Do we know why it's dated 2010? 2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think that's a separate 3 record. Because I think that record reflects that there was an 4 opportunity to purchase the leasehold outright in 2010. It's a 5 little bit of a complicated title. It's actually a leasehold. 6 She does own the lease; it's effectively owning it, but this 7 land, I think, has been in the possession of the Duke of 8 Westminster since, you know, 1500. It's a very complicated 9 chain of title in the UK. 10 But the way it works is you pass the leasehold from 11 one person to another. And that is effective ownership under 12 the land registry records. And that leasehold passed in -- the 13 contracts were exchanged in '96, and the deal closed in '97, in 14 January '97; and it was registered in a land registry as a 15 transfer of that title in March of '97. 16 THE COURT: And again, my question is not that it's to 17 prove when Ms. Maxwell purchased the home, but the defense's 18 proffer from counsel is that it is to prove that she did not 19 live there before 1996? 20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right. We have a witness, Kate, 21 who says -- she didn't live there before 1997, because that's 22 when she actually took possession of the property, right. 23 We have a witness, Kate, who has testified to events 24 that allegedly took place in the Kinnerton Street property in 25 '94 and '95. And these records show that she didn't own that",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Kate",
      "Duke of Westminster"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "UK",
      "Kinnerton Street"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2010",
      "1996",
      "1997",
      "January '97",
      "March of '97",
      "1994",
      "1995"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013868"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}