mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013870.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "11",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 246 2306 LCGVMAX1\n1 The first is the actual land registry records, which\n2 are here, which show -- and I can pass them up if the Court\n3 would like, which show the first ownership, which belongs to\n4 the O'Neills as of '92; and then title passing to Ms. Maxwell\n5 as of '97. That's here. There's also a land registry record\n6 which shows the actual transfer of title which describes all of\n7 this as well.\n8 And then there are the records that are found in\n9 Mr. Grumbridge's files, because he was the attorney who\n10 represented Ms. Maxwell in this transaction, which include that\n11 agreement for sale, because that's a private document, but it\n12 exists in his files, it's still there. And Mr. Rooney has seen\n13 it in his files in London. And he's prepared to testify to\n14 that because he's here today. And a few other documents that\n15 were in his files that relate to this sale of the property and\n16 the transfer of title at that time.\n17 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Rohrbach.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: I think that the point Mr. Everdell\n19 just made about how this is confusing and complicated\n20 reinforces two of the government's arguments.\n21 First of all, putting this confusing set of land\n22 transfers and leaseholds that speaks to when the defendant took\n23 ownership of the property would confuse the jury into having to\n24 understand British real estate law and actually says nothing\n25 about when she, in fact, occupied the property for the reasons\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013870",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 246 2306 LCGVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 The first is the actual land registry records, which\n2 are here, which show -- and I can pass them up if the Court\n3 would like, which show the first ownership, which belongs to\n4 the O'Neills as of '92; and then title passing to Ms. Maxwell\n5 as of '97. That's here. There's also a land registry record\n6 which shows the actual transfer of title which describes all of\n7 this as well.\n8 And then there are the records that are found in\n9 Mr. Grumbridge's files, because he was the attorney who\n10 represented Ms. Maxwell in this transaction, which include that\n11 agreement for sale, because that's a private document, but it\n12 exists in his files, it's still there. And Mr. Rooney has seen\n13 it in his files in London. And he's prepared to testify to\n14 that because he's here today. And a few other documents that\n15 were in his files that relate to this sale of the property and\n16 the transfer of title at that time.\n17 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Rohrbach.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: I think that the point Mr. Everdell\n19 just made about how this is confusing and complicated\n20 reinforces two of the government's arguments.\n21 First of all, putting this confusing set of land\n22 transfers and leaseholds that speaks to when the defendant took\n23 ownership of the property would confuse the jury into having to\n24 understand British real estate law and actually says nothing\n25 about when she, in fact, occupied the property for the reasons",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013870",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "O'Neills",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Grumbridge",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Rooney",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "London"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "'92",
      "'97",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013870"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}