mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013875.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "16",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 246 2311 LCGVMAX1\naddress for the first time she went to the defendant's house, at most. That's minimal impeachment value.\nTHE COURT: I think what makes sense here to talk about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership. And then that can come in with the government's deposition -- with the deposition of Ms. Maxwell saying she lived there beginning in '92 or '93. Then both sides can argue to the jury what they want.\nMR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\nThe government would -- I'd like to confer with the team, but I think the government would probably agree to a stipulation that included both the ownership fact and the deposition testimony, so they'll both come in.\nMR. EVERDELL: We'll have to confer on this, Judge, but I understand what the Court's position is.\nTHE COURT: Okay. It sounds like that gives you what you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date. And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she was in that -- she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to '97.\nMR. EVERDELL: Just to preview for the Court, I think\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013875",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 246 2311 LCGVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "address for the first time she went to the defendant's house, at most. That's minimal impeachment value.\nTHE COURT: I think what makes sense here to talk about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership. And then that can come in with the government's deposition -- with the deposition of Ms. Maxwell saying she lived there beginning in '92 or '93. Then both sides can argue to the jury what they want.\nMR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\nThe government would -- I'd like to confer with the team, but I think the government would probably agree to a stipulation that included both the ownership fact and the deposition testimony, so they'll both come in.\nMR. EVERDELL: We'll have to confer on this, Judge, but I understand what the Court's position is.\nTHE COURT: Okay. It sounds like that gives you what you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date. And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she was in that -- she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to '97.\nMR. EVERDELL: Just to preview for the Court, I think",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013875",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Kate",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "44 Kinnerton"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "'92",
      "'93",
      "'97",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013875"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}