| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "79",
- "document_number": "761",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "Court Transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 79 of 246 2374 LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct\n\nQ. Do you remember what nationality she was?\nA. English.\nQ. Did she speak in a British accent?\nA. Yes.\nQ. All right. I want to direct your attention now to the final years of your employment, okay, so roughly 2000 to 2002, all right?\nWere Epstein and Ghislaine still involved in a romantic relationship or was that over by this time?\nA. I think it was over by that time.\nQ. Was Ghislaine still working for Epstein at that time?\nA. Yes.\nQ. Did her employment role for Epstein stay the same at this time or did it change at this time?\nA. Stayed the same.\nQ. Okay. Did she have as much involvement in his affairs or were other people working for Epstein as well?\nA. Well, there were other people working for Epstein. I don't know.\nQ. Let me ask this: How often was Ghislaine coming into the office in the latter two years of your employment?\nA. Not often. It started -- you know, at first it was almost every day; then it became a few times a week; and then it was -- towards the end it was full-time she wasn't coming into the office.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013938",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 79 of 246 2374 LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Q. Do you remember what nationality she was?\nA. English.\nQ. Did she speak in a British accent?\nA. Yes.\nQ. All right. I want to direct your attention now to the final years of your employment, okay, so roughly 2000 to 2002, all right?\nWere Epstein and Ghislaine still involved in a romantic relationship or was that over by this time?\nA. I think it was over by that time.\nQ. Was Ghislaine still working for Epstein at that time?\nA. Yes.\nQ. Did her employment role for Epstein stay the same at this time or did it change at this time?\nA. Stayed the same.\nQ. Okay. Did she have as much involvement in his affairs or were other people working for Epstein as well?\nA. Well, there were other people working for Epstein. I don't know.\nQ. Let me ask this: How often was Ghislaine coming into the office in the latter two years of your employment?\nA. Not often. It started -- you know, at first it was almost every day; then it became a few times a week; and then it was -- towards the end it was full-time she wasn't coming into the office.",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013938",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Epstein",
- "Ghislaine"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22",
- "2000",
- "2002"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "761",
- "DOJ-OGR-00013938"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|