mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013948.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "89",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 89 of 246 2384 LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct\n\n1 videoconference with the government?\n2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.\n3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this\n4 videoconference for the first time with the government?\n5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.\n6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about\n7 when this would have happened?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?\n10 A. November 2020.\n11 Q. Okay. All right.\n12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in\n13 this case?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you\n16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever\n17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?\n18 A. No.\n19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?\n20 A. No.\n21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: Overruled.\n23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is\n24 that right?\n25 A. Correct.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013948",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 89 of 246 2384 LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 videoconference with the government?\n2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.\n3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this\n4 videoconference for the first time with the government?\n5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.\n6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about\n7 when this would have happened?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?\n10 A. November 2020.\n11 Q. Okay. All right.\n12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in\n13 this case?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you\n16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever\n17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?\n18 A. No.\n19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?\n20 A. No.\n21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: Overruled.\n23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is\n24 that right?\n25 A. Correct.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013948",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Ms. Espinosa",
      "Ms. Pomerantz"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "November 2020",
      "1996",
      "2002",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013948"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}