mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014028.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "169",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 169 of 246 LCGVMAX5 Loftus - cross right up there, there's a chapter in that book -- multiple chapters dedicated to high-profile cases in which she's testified. THE COURT: Wait. So I allowed it because it goes to motive, an ironic objection, but it goes -- if she has a motive to testify in high-profile cases, that's monetary. I suppose the inference is available as to her motive and credibility, so that's why I allowed it. Why are we going into specific cases in which she testified? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, it's not an accident. She's testifying here on the heels of her testimony at the Harvey Weinstein trial. I would note that in multiple instances, for instance, when Jane was testifying, the defense insisted on a need to name a particular name of a pageant. It wasn't enough to just say national pageant. Here we are, it's the same issue that's coming up, your Honor, is that the relevance of this detail. It is relevant, your Honor, that this is after she did that. She testified in the Harvey Weinstein trial. There is a New Yorker Magazine article that's published on her in which she participates in the interview and she -- THE COURT: You're just trying to associate her with other people who have bad reputations. And frankly, Ms. Pomerantz, to suggest otherwise is to show a lack of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014028",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 169 of 246 LCGVMAX5 Loftus - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "right up there, there's a chapter in that book -- multiple chapters dedicated to high-profile cases in which she's testified. THE COURT: Wait. So I allowed it because it goes to motive, an ironic objection, but it goes -- if she has a motive to testify in high-profile cases, that's monetary. I suppose the inference is available as to her motive and credibility, so that's why I allowed it. Why are we going into specific cases in which she testified? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, it's not an accident. She's testifying here on the heels of her testimony at the Harvey Weinstein trial. I would note that in multiple instances, for instance, when Jane was testifying, the defense insisted on a need to name a particular name of a pageant. It wasn't enough to just say national pageant. Here we are, it's the same issue that's coming up, your Honor, is that the relevance of this detail. It is relevant, your Honor, that this is after she did that. She testified in the Harvey Weinstein trial. There is a New Yorker Magazine article that's published on her in which she participates in the interview and she -- THE COURT: You're just trying to associate her with other people who have bad reputations. And frankly, Ms. Pomerantz, to suggest otherwise is to show a lack of",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014028",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Harvey Weinstein",
      "Ms. Pomerantz"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "New Yorker Magazine"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014028"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}