DOJ-OGR-00014097.json 3.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "238",
  4. "document_number": "761",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 246 2533 LCGVMAX7 Hyppolite - direct 1 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. I think we can take the same chart we have both been working off of and just eliminate the ones that are no longer -- or somehow with color indicate the ones that are still in dispute. 5 THE COURT: Yes. Or give me a new chart with the ones that are in dispute and each just very briefly state each side's position. 8 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 9 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. 10 THE COURT: Okay. The only other thing -- oh, right. So I gave you till 6 o'clock on what I didn't recall at the time. It was your response on the remaining witness. I 13 sort of staggered the response time on the motion to preclude based on when we thought we would have witnesses. 15 So who remains in dispute who will be called tomorrow? 16 MS. MENNINGER: I think there were Eva, Michelle, and Kelly. I think Mr. Lopez, I believe, we're not calling. 18 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor. 19 MS. MENNINGER: So that one is no longer in dispute. 20 THE COURT: Okay. So you said Eva, Michelle, and Kelly. 22 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 23 THE COURT: So they will be called tomorrow if they 24 are not precluded. 25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. I believe so. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014097",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 246 2533 LCGVMAX7 Hyppolite - direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. I think we can take the same chart we have both been working off of and just eliminate the ones that are no longer -- or somehow with color indicate the ones that are still in dispute. 5 THE COURT: Yes. Or give me a new chart with the ones that are in dispute and each just very briefly state each side's position. 8 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 9 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. 10 THE COURT: Okay. The only other thing -- oh, right. So I gave you till 6 o'clock on what I didn't recall at the time. It was your response on the remaining witness. I 13 sort of staggered the response time on the motion to preclude based on when we thought we would have witnesses. 15 So who remains in dispute who will be called tomorrow? 16 MS. MENNINGER: I think there were Eva, Michelle, and Kelly. I think Mr. Lopez, I believe, we're not calling. 18 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor. 19 MS. MENNINGER: So that one is no longer in dispute. 20 THE COURT: Okay. So you said Eva, Michelle, and Kelly. 22 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 23 THE COURT: So they will be called tomorrow if they 24 are not precluded. 25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. I believe so.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014097",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. MENNINGER",
  36. "THE COURT",
  37. "MS. COMEY",
  38. "MR. EVERDELL",
  39. "Mr. Lopez",
  40. "Eva",
  41. "Michelle",
  42. "Kelly"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "08/10/22"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  53. "761",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00014097"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }