mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014103.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "244",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 246 2539\nLCGVMAX7 Hyppolite - direct\n1 completing closings and the charge on Monday.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\n3 THE COURT: Okay.\n4 MS. MENNINGER: May I inquire, your Honor? In some\n5 courtrooms I've been in there is a rule, perhaps not strongly\n6 enforced, but strongly suggested, that the government only\n7 reserve a certain portion of their summation for the rebuttal\n8 piece because otherwise it ends up being a bit of a more in\n9 rebuttal than in the actual substance. I don't know if your\n10 Honor has that practice, but I would request that some\n11 reasonable percentage be allocated to the first versus the\n12 rebuttal portion.\n13 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I expect the rebuttal will be\n14 significantly shorter than the closing. I don't think that's\n15 going to be an issue.\n16 THE COURT: Well, it certainly should be. It should\n17 be rebuttal and not --\n18 MS. COMEY: That's exactly right, your Honor. And\n19 I'll be doing the rebuttal. I fully intend it to be much\n20 shorter than the closing and to the point, as is consistent\n21 with our office practice before your Honor and in this\n22 district.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n24 Let me just check my various inputs to see if I'm\n25 missing -- check with my law clerk.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014103",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 246 2539",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCGVMAX7 Hyppolite - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 completing closings and the charge on Monday.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\n3 THE COURT: Okay.\n4 MS. MENNINGER: May I inquire, your Honor? In some\n5 courtrooms I've been in there is a rule, perhaps not strongly\n6 enforced, but strongly suggested, that the government only\n7 reserve a certain portion of their summation for the rebuttal\n8 piece because otherwise it ends up being a bit of a more in\n9 rebuttal than in the actual substance. I don't know if your\n10 Honor has that practice, but I would request that some\n11 reasonable percentage be allocated to the first versus the\n12 rebuttal portion.\n13 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I expect the rebuttal will be\n14 significantly shorter than the closing. I don't think that's\n15 going to be an issue.\n16 THE COURT: Well, it certainly should be. It should\n17 be rebuttal and not --\n18 MS. COMEY: That's exactly right, your Honor. And\n19 I'll be doing the rebuttal. I fully intend it to be much\n20 shorter than the closing and to the point, as is consistent\n21 with our office practice before your Honor and in this\n22 district.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n24 Let me just check my various inputs to see if I'm\n25 missing -- check with my law clerk.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014103",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014103"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}