DOJ-OGR-00014114.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "8",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 197 2549 LCFCmax1\na decision not to call him.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, just to clarify, I don't think that's an accurate representation as to Detective Byrne.\nAnd I, again, would note that the very capable tech folks were here working and troubleshooting the issue. And I understand the decision not to call Mr. Hamilton was not with the technological issues, but instead a decision that defense counsel has made.\nMS. STERNHEIM: We could go on all day, Judge, but suffice it to say, we're not calling Mr. Hamilton.\nTHE COURT: You're not calling Mr. Hamilton and you have no additional application regarding being able to call him remotely with public access at the same time. Your concern is there would be a limitation of public access during his testimony, and for that reason, you've decided -- well, that's the case, and you've decided not to call him.\nMS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. Thank you.\nTHE COURT: All right. Thank you. Anything else?\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, just in terms of timing, there is one brief piece of evidence that we may seek to introduce as rebuttal evidence. I think it would take 10 minutes, at most, to get in. We just need to know whether we should have those witnesses - who are basically custodians - available at the end of today or if they should be available Monday.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014114",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 197 2549 LCFCmax1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "a decision not to call him.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, just to clarify, I don't think that's an accurate representation as to Detective Byrne.\nAnd I, again, would note that the very capable tech folks were here working and troubleshooting the issue. And I understand the decision not to call Mr. Hamilton was not with the technological issues, but instead a decision that defense counsel has made.\nMS. STERNHEIM: We could go on all day, Judge, but suffice it to say, we're not calling Mr. Hamilton.\nTHE COURT: You're not calling Mr. Hamilton and you have no additional application regarding being able to call him remotely with public access at the same time. Your concern is there would be a limitation of public access during his testimony, and for that reason, you've decided -- well, that's the case, and you've decided not to call him.\nMS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. Thank you.\nTHE COURT: All right. Thank you. Anything else?\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, just in terms of timing, there is one brief piece of evidence that we may seek to introduce as rebuttal evidence. I think it would take 10 minutes, at most, to get in. We just need to know whether we should have those witnesses - who are basically custodians - available at the end of today or if they should be available Monday.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014114",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Detective Byrne",
  36. "Mr. Hamilton",
  37. "MS. POMERANTZ",
  38. "MS. STERNHEIM",
  39. "MS. COMEY"
  40. ],
  41. "organizations": [
  42. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  43. ],
  44. "locations": [],
  45. "dates": [
  46. "08/10/22",
  47. "Monday"
  48. ],
  49. "reference_numbers": [
  50. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  51. "763",
  52. "DOJ-OGR-00014114"
  53. ]
  54. },
  55. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  56. }