mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014124.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "18",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 197 2559\nLCFCmax1\n\n1    five full days, including three business days. They had extra\n2    days' notice that we were going to rest on Friday of last week,\n3    and they had plenty of time in advance of trial to plan for\n4    this. So we strongly disagree with the suggestion that defense\n5    counsel has been unduly rushed here.\n6        MS. MENNINGER:  I can go back and forth on this, as\n7    well, your Honor.\n8        THE COURT:  We're not going to go back and forth. The\n9    record is what it is. There was a five-day, three-business-day\n10   break between the close of the government's case. The record\n11   will reflect when you learned when the government will likely\n12   rest, the record will reflect what you said regarding when you\n13   learned of a nonresponsive witness, and the record will reflect\n14   that I will take an application within a half an hour with an\n15   opportunity for the government to respond all in the interest\n16   of conforming to my standard practice, which is everybody has\n17   their next witness or be prepared to rest or bring in a\n18   different witness.\n19       Now, we'll take it as it comes. What I'm learning,\n20   what is new information to me today, which is different than\n21   yesterday, when we knew when I was informed that the defense\n22   would rest today with the exception of some small issue or\n23   document that Ms. Menninger put aside. There is no argument\n24   about a subpoenaed witness who is nonresponsive. There was no\n25   suggestion of a need for a witness to fly in from England. So\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014124",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 197 2559",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCFCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    five full days, including three business days. They had extra\ndays' notice that we were going to rest on Friday of last week,\nand they had plenty of time in advance of trial to plan for\nthis. So we strongly disagree with the suggestion that defense\ncounsel has been unduly rushed here.\nMS. MENNINGER:  I can go back and forth on this, as\nwell, your Honor.\nTHE COURT:  We're not going to go back and forth. The\nrecord is what it is. There was a five-day, three-business-day\nbreak between the close of the government's case. The record\nwill reflect when you learned when the government will likely\nrest, the record will reflect what you said regarding when you\nlearned of a nonresponsive witness, and the record will reflect\nthat I will take an application within a half an hour with an\nopportunity for the government to respond all in the interest\nof conforming to my standard practice, which is everybody has\ntheir next witness or be prepared to rest or bring in a\ndifferent witness.\nNow, we'll take it as it comes. What I'm learning,\nwhat is new information to me today, which is different than\nyesterday, when we knew when I was informed that the defense\nwould rest today with the exception of some small issue or\ndocument that Ms. Menninger put aside. There is no argument\nabout a subpoenaed witness who is nonresponsive. There was no\nsuggestion of a need for a witness to fly in from England. So",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014124",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "England"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "Friday of last week",
      "yesterday",
      "today"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014124"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}