mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014135.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "29",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 197 2570 LCFCmax1\npotentially having to testify.\nTHE COURT: I think that's a conferral question. I don't have a basis to know.\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I'm asking so that there is a clear record.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, you can think about it.\nMS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure what the status is of this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a stipulation --\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe that was precluded. Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the only permissible testimony would have been the email from -- the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would help her case and that all other testimony about attorneys would be precluded.\nTHE COURT: If this is implicated in the motion related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling with respect to that.\nMS. MENNINGER: I'll have to look back at that, your Honor. That's the only other thing that's coming to mind with respect to Mr. Rossmiller's potential --\nTHE COURT: That series was questioned during the testimony, which may have been my basis.\nMS. MENNINGER: It may be, your Honor. I just don't\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014135",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 197 2570 LCFCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "potentially having to testify.\nTHE COURT: I think that's a conferral question. I don't have a basis to know.\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I'm asking so that there is a clear record.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, you can think about it.\nMS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure what the status is of this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a stipulation --\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe that was precluded. Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the only permissible testimony would have been the email from -- the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would help her case and that all other testimony about attorneys would be precluded.\nTHE COURT: If this is implicated in the motion related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling with respect to that.\nMS. MENNINGER: I'll have to look back at that, your Honor. That's the only other thing that's coming to mind with respect to Mr. Rossmiller's potential --\nTHE COURT: That series was questioned during the testimony, which may have been my basis.\nMS. MENNINGER: It may be, your Honor. I just don't",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014135",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Comey",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Mr. Glassman",
      "Mr. Rossmiller"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014135"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}