mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014144.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "38",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 38 of 197 2579\nLCFCmax1\n1 You essentially want the -- I'm a little with Mr. Rohrbach.\n2 I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin\n3 to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing, but you\n4 want the government to testify, well, we didn't get geo\n5 location information because it didn't exist.\n6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'll be very transparent.\n7 I think the point is highlighting the age of the allegations, which I think is a fair point to make to the jury. These are\n8 allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on\n9 allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going\n10 to have the same type of corroboration available to you because\n11 records get destroyed in that amount of time. The records\n12 aren't available that long ago that are available today that\n13 you might otherwise expect to to see in a case like this.\n14\n15 But the bigger point is just the age of the\n16 allegations. So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that\n17 these are 25-year-old allegations.\n18 (Continued on next page)\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014144",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 38 of 197 2579",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCFCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 You essentially want the -- I'm a little with Mr. Rohrbach.\n2 I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin\n3 to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing, but you\n4 want the government to testify, well, we didn't get geo\n5 location information because it didn't exist.\n6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'll be very transparent.\n7 I think the point is highlighting the age of the allegations, which I think is a fair point to make to the jury. These are\n8 allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on\n9 allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going\n10 to have the same type of corroboration available to you because\n11 records get destroyed in that amount of time. The records\n12 aren't available that long ago that are available today that\n13 you might otherwise expect to to see in a case like this.\n14\n15 But the bigger point is just the age of the\n16 allegations. So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that\n17 these are 25-year-old allegations.\n18 (Continued on next page)",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014144",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014144"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}