mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014150.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "44",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/2022",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 44 of 197 2585\nLCHVMAX2\n1 if this was now appropriate line of cross.\n2 THE COURT: No.\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor. Okay.\n4 Then there are two other issues then. I did want to\n5 get into this with this witness, that the investigation of the\n6 allegations against Ms. Maxwell started with the first three of\n7 the accusers, and that time period was focused, so that's Jane,\n8 Annie Farmer, and Kate. And that time period was focused on\n9 '94 to '97. And then they got an indictment based on those\n10 charges. And then later, they talked to Carolyn and they\n11 amended the indictment, and those allegations relate to a later\n12 time period, 2001 to 2004, and that those are the subject of\n13 the last two counts in the indictment, Counts Five and Six.\n14 The purpose of this, your Honor, is just to be able to\n15 show the jury that there are -- there's a difference between\n16 those counts and who the witnesses are, information whose\n17 evidence is related to those counts. And I think that's\n18 relevant to be able to explain that to the jury without\n19 getting -- it doesn't really talk about investigative steps;\n20 it's just simply saying, You talked to Carolyn after you spoke\n21 to these three first. These are the three who you originally\n22 had evidence from against Ms. Maxwell. Carolyn came to you\n23 later. You spoke to her first in 2019; she wanted to talk to\n24 you with a lawyer. You didn't speak to her again until a year\n25 later. At that point you did meet with her. You took her\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014150",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 44 of 197 2585",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHVMAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 if this was now appropriate line of cross.\n2 THE COURT: No.\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor. Okay.\n4 Then there are two other issues then. I did want to\n5 get into this with this witness, that the investigation of the\n6 allegations against Ms. Maxwell started with the first three of\n7 the accusers, and that time period was focused, so that's Jane,\n8 Annie Farmer, and Kate. And that time period was focused on\n9 '94 to '97. And then they got an indictment based on those\n10 charges. And then later, they talked to Carolyn and they\n11 amended the indictment, and those allegations relate to a later\n12 time period, 2001 to 2004, and that those are the subject of\n13 the last two counts in the indictment, Counts Five and Six.\n14 The purpose of this, your Honor, is just to be able to\n15 show the jury that there are -- there's a difference between\n16 those counts and who the witnesses are, information whose\n17 evidence is related to those counts. And I think that's\n18 relevant to be able to explain that to the jury without\n19 getting -- it doesn't really talk about investigative steps;\n20 it's just simply saying, You talked to Carolyn after you spoke\n21 to these three first. These are the three who you originally\n22 had evidence from against Ms. Maxwell. Carolyn came to you\n23 later. You spoke to her first in 2019; she wanted to talk to\n24 you with a lawyer. You didn't speak to her again until a year\n25 later. At that point you did meet with her. You took her",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014150",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Annie Farmer",
      "Kate",
      "Carolyn",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "'94",
      "'97",
      "2001",
      "2004",
      "2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "2585",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014150"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}