DOJ-OGR-00014153.json 3.9 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "47",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/2022",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 47 of 197 2588 LCHVMAX2\nto do it with the agent was efficiency, which I would say he said it with a straight face, but I can't tell with the mask on.\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I would just raise one last point, since we're going through all this. I also would like to go through with Agent Young the fact of the search that occurred in Mr. Epstein's residence in 2019. The number of devices that were taken, the fact that she, I believe, reviewed virtually everything that was on those devices personally -- maybe not all of it, but the vast majority of it. There were millions of pages, millions of files in those documents. And we have only -- the government has only presented a certain number of those for the jury. But I think I need to be able to get out the fact that there were millions and millions of pages --\nTHE COURT: That's in evidence, is it not?\nMR. EVERDELL: I don't know the number of files that were extracted from the devices is in evidence. I believe she would know at least anecdotally, because I think she reviewed all of this.\nTHE COURT: Do you have the witness who extracted? Didn't we have the person?\nMR. EVERDELL: We had Mr. Flatley.\nMS. COMEY: That was Kimberly Meder, your Honor. And Ms. Menninger on cross-examination of Ms. Meder did elicit that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014153",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 47 of 197 2588 LCHVMAX2",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "to do it with the agent was efficiency, which I would say he said it with a straight face, but I can't tell with the mask on.\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I would just raise one last point, since we're going through all this. I also would like to go through with Agent Young the fact of the search that occurred in Mr. Epstein's residence in 2019. The number of devices that were taken, the fact that she, I believe, reviewed virtually everything that was on those devices personally -- maybe not all of it, but the vast majority of it. There were millions of pages, millions of files in those documents. And we have only -- the government has only presented a certain number of those for the jury. But I think I need to be able to get out the fact that there were millions and millions of pages --\nTHE COURT: That's in evidence, is it not?\nMR. EVERDELL: I don't know the number of files that were extracted from the devices is in evidence. I believe she would know at least anecdotally, because I think she reviewed all of this.\nTHE COURT: Do you have the witness who extracted? Didn't we have the person?\nMR. EVERDELL: We had Mr. Flatley.\nMS. COMEY: That was Kimberly Meder, your Honor. And Ms. Menninger on cross-examination of Ms. Meder did elicit that",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014153",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. EVERDELL",
  36. "Agent Young",
  37. "Mr. Epstein",
  38. "THE COURT",
  39. "MS. COMEY",
  40. "Ms. Menninger",
  41. "Ms. Meder",
  42. "Mr. Flatley",
  43. "Kimberly Meder"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  47. ],
  48. "locations": [],
  49. "dates": [
  50. "08/10/22",
  51. "2019"
  52. ],
  53. "reference_numbers": [
  54. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  55. "763",
  56. "DOJ-OGR-00014153"
  57. ]
  58. },
  59. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  60. }