DOJ-OGR-00014212.json 3.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "106",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 106 of 197 2647 LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct 1 (Jury not present) 2 THE COURT: You may step down, Dr. Dubin. 3 (Witness excused) 4 Go ahead, Ms. Moe. 5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. So as the 6 Court is aware, there are flight records in evidence. We would 7 certainly have no objection to Mr. Pagliuca asking this witness 8 whether she recognizes them, whether they're accurate, the 9 like, that is entirely appropriate, but I think it's very 10 confusing to ask about what her memory is of what she saw in 11 the media and whether that's accurate. I think there is no way 12 for the jury to tell what witness we're talking about, whether 13 it's the items in evidence -- I think the proper way to do this 14 is to show the witness the flight records and ask whether 15 they're accurate or not. If we're talking about things that 16 are not in evidence and whether things that are not in evidence 17 are accurate, I don't see the relevance of it, and that, of 18 course, wouldn't be appropriate. 19 THE COURT: What is the relevance, Mr. Pagliuca? 20 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the relevance is patent, your 21 Honor. 22 THE COURT: Perhaps, but not to me. 23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Here's why. These flight records were, 24 in some fashion, leaked to the media. 25 THE COURT: When you say these flight records, you SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014212",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 106 of 197 2647",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 (Jury not present) 2 THE COURT: You may step down, Dr. Dubin. 3 (Witness excused) 4 Go ahead, Ms. Moe. 5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. So as the 6 Court is aware, there are flight records in evidence. We would 7 certainly have no objection to Mr. Pagliuca asking this witness 8 whether she recognizes them, whether they're accurate, the 9 like, that is entirely appropriate, but I think it's very 10 confusing to ask about what her memory is of what she saw in 11 the media and whether that's accurate. I think there is no way 12 for the jury to tell what witness we're talking about, whether 13 it's the items in evidence -- I think the proper way to do this 14 is to show the witness the flight records and ask whether 15 they're accurate or not. If we're talking about things that 16 are not in evidence and whether things that are not in evidence 17 are accurate, I don't see the relevance of it, and that, of 18 course, wouldn't be appropriate. 19 THE COURT: What is the relevance, Mr. Pagliuca? 20 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the relevance is patent, your 21 Honor. 22 THE COURT: Perhaps, but not to me. 23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Here's why. These flight records were, 24 in some fashion, leaked to the media. 25 THE COURT: When you say these flight records, you",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014212",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Dr. Dubin",
  41. "Ms. Moe",
  42. "Mr. Pagliuca"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "08/10/22"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  53. "763",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00014212"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }