mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014213.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "107",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 107 of 197 2648 LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct\n1 mean the flight records that are in evidence?\n2 MS. MOE: That's not correct, your Honor. The\n3 entirety of the flight records in evidence are not public.\n4 That's the exact reason why portions of them are under seal and\n5 redacted. So we're not talking about the same flight records.\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I disagree, but the point is, we\n7 had a live witness who reviewed what purported to be in the\n8 media her travel with Mr. Epstein. That media exposure has\n9 influenced other people and I believe, frankly, influenced\n10 other people, relative to my client, putting my client on\n11 flights saying my client did things. It is the exposure to\n12 this information. This witness, I believe, will testify, and\n13 has so indicated to the government, that what she viewed was\n14 inaccurate information. That's the import of it.\n15 THE COURT: So the theory is media defined broadly,\n16 could be a blog, a tweet, contains any inaccurate information,\n17 it is relevant to ask this witness as to the accuracy of that?\n18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It is inaccurate as to her personally.\n19 THE COURT: I understand. But let's say you pull from\n20 some blog post, something perhaps inaccurate; relevant to ask\n21 this witness?\n22 MR. PAGLIUCA: About her and flight records.\n23 THE COURT: Whatever it is from whatever source, there\n24 is flight records that show she went to the moon, you should\n25 ask her about it?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014213",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 107 of 197 2648 LCHCmax3 Dubin - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "mean the flight records that are in evidence?\nMS. MOE: That's not correct, your Honor. The\nentirety of the flight records in evidence are not public.\nThat's the exact reason why portions of them are under seal and\nredacted. So we're not talking about the same flight records.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I disagree, but the point is, we\nhad a live witness who reviewed what purported to be in the\nmedia her travel with Mr. Epstein. That media exposure has\ninfluenced other people and I believe, frankly, influenced\nother people, relative to my client, putting my client on\nflights saying my client did things. It is the exposure to\nthis information. This witness, I believe, will testify, and\nhas so indicated to the government, that what she viewed was\ninaccurate information. That's the import of it.\nTHE COURT: So the theory is media defined broadly,\ncould be a blog, a tweet, contains any inaccurate information,\nit is relevant to ask this witness as to the accuracy of that?\nMR. PAGLIUCA: It is inaccurate as to her personally.\nTHE COURT: I understand. But let's say you pull from\nsome blog post, something perhaps inaccurate; relevant to ask\nthis witness?\nMR. PAGLIUCA: About her and flight records.\nTHE COURT: Whatever it is from whatever source, there\nis flight records that show she went to the moon, you should\nask her about it?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014213",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "THE COURT",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014213"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}