mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014232.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "126",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 126 of 197 2667\nLCHVMAX4\nDubin - cross\n1 A. That's correct.\n2 Q. And then your second child was born later in the 1990s?\n3 A. 1997.\n4 Q. And so you had a lot going on in the 1990s; is that right?\n5 A. That's correct.\n6 Q. I want to ask you now about your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And in particular, I want to ask you about your observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.\n7 Did you ever have any conversations with Jeffrey Epstein about the nature of his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as being hearsay, calling for a hearsay response.\n9 THE COURT: Just a moment.\n10 Sustained.\n11 Q. Dr. Dubin, based on your conversations -- well, I'll withdraw that and rephrase.\n12 Did you have occasions in the 1990s to observe the interactions between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein?\n13 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm going to object to this as being vague, time frame, and lacking in foundation.\n14 THE COURT: Foundation, overruled.\n15 Time frame, sustained.\n16 Q. Dr. Dubin, focusing on the time frame from 1994 to 2000,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014232",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 126 of 197 2667",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHVMAX4\nDubin - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. That's correct.\n2 Q. And then your second child was born later in the 1990s?\n3 A. 1997.\n4 Q. And so you had a lot going on in the 1990s; is that right?\n5 A. That's correct.\n6 Q. I want to ask you now about your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And in particular, I want to ask you about your observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.\n7 Did you ever have any conversations with Jeffrey Epstein about the nature of his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as being hearsay, calling for a hearsay response.\n9 THE COURT: Just a moment.\n10 Sustained.\n11 Q. Dr. Dubin, based on your conversations -- well, I'll withdraw that and rephrase.\n12 Did you have occasions in the 1990s to observe the interactions between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein?\n13 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm going to object to this as being vague, time frame, and lacking in foundation.\n14 THE COURT: Foundation, overruled.\n15 Time frame, sustained.\n16 Q. Dr. Dubin, focusing on the time frame from 1994 to 2000,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014232",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Dr. Dubin",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1997",
      "1994",
      "2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014232"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}