DOJ-OGR-00014251.json 3.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "145",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 145 of 197 2686 LCHVMAX4 witness is represented in connection with this case. THE COURT: Okay. MS. MENNINGER: There was no counsel appointed for this witness as there were with other witnesses. THE COURT: And so the efforts made to contact the witness consisted of what? MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I was not the one doing it myself. I can get the detail from my assistants who were making the calls, and also our investigator that was making the calls. I can get the dates and times of the calls. I don't have that on me at the moment. THE COURT: Okay. I think I need to understand, since I'm -- given where we are and what I'm -- in the trial, and I see that the subpoena -- so the subpoena was -- the return date was for the first day of trial. So I would like details as to what efforts were made to contact the witness. I guess the other question is the testimony that you're seeking from this witness is the same essentially as the last two witnesses? MS. MENNINGER: It's very similar, your Honor. There's only one distinction with this one. On this one, Jane told the government early on that Kelly could confirm her story about what was going on. That's in the 3500. I can pull up the exact verbiage. And she also gave the woman's last name. So it was highly specific reference that this -- she also said SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 145 of 197 2686 LCHVMAX4",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "witness is represented in connection with this case. THE COURT: Okay. MS. MENNINGER: There was no counsel appointed for this witness as there were with other witnesses. THE COURT: And so the efforts made to contact the witness consisted of what? MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I was not the one doing it myself. I can get the detail from my assistants who were making the calls, and also our investigator that was making the calls. I can get the dates and times of the calls. I don't have that on me at the moment. THE COURT: Okay. I think I need to understand, since I'm -- given where we are and what I'm -- in the trial, and I see that the subpoena -- so the subpoena was -- the return date was for the first day of trial. So I would like details as to what efforts were made to contact the witness. I guess the other question is the testimony that you're seeking from this witness is the same essentially as the last two witnesses? MS. MENNINGER: It's very similar, your Honor. There's only one distinction with this one. On this one, Jane told the government early on that Kelly could confirm her story about what was going on. That's in the 3500. I can pull up the exact verbiage. And she also gave the woman's last name. So it was highly specific reference that this -- she also said",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "MS. MENNINGER",
  31. "Jane",
  32. "Kelly"
  33. ],
  34. "organizations": [
  35. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  36. "THE COURT",
  37. "government"
  38. ],
  39. "locations": [],
  40. "dates": [
  41. "08/10/22"
  42. ],
  43. "reference_numbers": [
  44. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  45. "763",
  46. "3500",
  47. "2686",
  48. "212 805-0300"
  49. ]
  50. },
  51. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  52. }