mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014255.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "149",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 197 2690 LCHCmax5\n\nMS. MENNINGER: That was an application, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: It was an application. It was an application that you asked to respond to at -- I think it was 6 o'clock last night. So I didn't get your response on that until 6 o'clock last night. I ruled as fast as I could, which meant last night, I think it was probably after 11:00 p.m. or close to midnight, but thought it was important to give that resolution as soon as I could once the issue was raised and I had full briefing.\nEven if there hadn't been an application to preclude that witness, you hadn't taken steps to enforce the subpoena until 11:55 a.m. today. I'm going to look at the materials, but I just want to have the factual record that I need to make a determination.\nMS. MENNINGER: I can email chambers as soon as I gather the dates and times of the communication efforts. I can put that in a writing, this way your Honor has a factual record on it.\nMS. MOE: Just with respect to developing a record on this issue, I just want to make sure it's clear that when we produced 3500 materials, we designated them for testifying witnesses, which was a much narrower scope. Accompanied with that, I think, earlier than October, was a letter identifying the particular victims in this case. The materials with respect to Jane talked about the very, very limited number of\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014255",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 197 2690 LCHCmax5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MENNINGER: That was an application, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: It was an application. It was an application that you asked to respond to at -- I think it was 6 o'clock last night. So I didn't get your response on that until 6 o'clock last night. I ruled as fast as I could, which meant last night, I think it was probably after 11:00 p.m. or close to midnight, but thought it was important to give that resolution as soon as I could once the issue was raised and I had full briefing.\nEven if there hadn't been an application to preclude that witness, you hadn't taken steps to enforce the subpoena until 11:55 a.m. today. I'm going to look at the materials, but I just want to have the factual record that I need to make a determination.\nMS. MENNINGER: I can email chambers as soon as I gather the dates and times of the communication efforts. I can put that in a writing, this way your Honor has a factual record on it.\nMS. MOE: Just with respect to developing a record on this issue, I just want to make sure it's clear that when we produced 3500 materials, we designated them for testifying witnesses, which was a much narrower scope. Accompanied with that, I think, earlier than October, was a letter identifying the particular victims in this case. The materials with respect to Jane talked about the very, very limited number of",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014255",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. MOE",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "October"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014255"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}