mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014267.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "161",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 197 2702 LCHCmax5 1 lived there from '92 to '93; right? In fact, your argument is 2 it's a factual impossibility that she lived there in '92, '93? 3 MR. EVERDELL: I'm saying the witness is mistaken 4 based on the property records, yes, your Honor. 5 MS. MOE: Just like Ms. Maxwell, your Honor. That's 6 why this is such a sideshow. 7 THE COURT: Look, I always say, I have so many bridges 8 to across, I cross the bridge that's in front of me. So what 9 is the question? 10 MR. EVERDELL: Well, so, there are, I think, a few 11 questions. We still have to confer on the stipulation to the 12 Kinnerton Street records. We are going to propose being able 13 to admit the land registry records showing the transfer of 14 title of both the Kinnerton Street residence and the Stanhope 15 Mews residence. Those are both land registry documents. And 16 by the way, your Honor, those are selfauthenticating because 17 they came from the land registry and they are 18 selfauthenticating foreign public documents. Those can be 19 admitted just by themselves, but we want a stipulation to the 20 fact that they reflect certain information. And I think what 21 the Court said is if we're going to be permitted to admit 22 those, the defense should be able to permit -- sorry. The 23 prosecution should be able to admit that deposition testimony 24 from when Ms. Maxwell said '92, '93. 25 So we have to -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014267",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 197 2702 LCHCmax5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 lived there from '92 to '93; right? In fact, your argument is 2 it's a factual impossibility that she lived there in '92, '93? 3 MR. EVERDELL: I'm saying the witness is mistaken 4 based on the property records, yes, your Honor. 5 MS. MOE: Just like Ms. Maxwell, your Honor. That's 6 why this is such a sideshow. 7 THE COURT: Look, I always say, I have so many bridges 8 to across, I cross the bridge that's in front of me. So what 9 is the question? 10 MR. EVERDELL: Well, so, there are, I think, a few 11 questions. We still have to confer on the stipulation to the 12 Kinnerton Street records. We are going to propose being able 13 to admit the land registry records showing the transfer of 14 title of both the Kinnerton Street residence and the Stanhope 15 Mews residence. Those are both land registry documents. And 16 by the way, your Honor, those are selfauthenticating because 17 they came from the land registry and they are 18 selfauthenticating foreign public documents. Those can be 19 admitted just by themselves, but we want a stipulation to the 20 fact that they reflect certain information. And I think what 21 the Court said is if we're going to be permitted to admit 22 those, the defense should be able to permit -- sorry. The 23 prosecution should be able to admit that deposition testimony 24 from when Ms. Maxwell said '92, '93. 25 So we have to --",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014267",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MAXWELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Kinnerton Street",
      "Stanhope Mews"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "'92",
      "'93",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014267"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}