mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014271.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "165",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 165 of 197 2706 LCHCmax5\n1\nTHE COURT: Well, you'll discuss it and when I come back, you'll tell me, both sides, what the application is.\n2\nWhat do we have after lunch?\n3\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think we would like to use the lunch break to hammer out the final stipulations. If\n4\nwe can have extra time to get that done, I think that's going to be it, is the reading of the stipulations. There are some documents, but these are things we have to go through over the break.\n5\nTHE COURT: So basically no other defense witnesses are available today following stips. And then the open question, is the defense seeking to have potentially this rebuttal, rebuttal, rebuttal on points, the witness regarding timing of residence on Monday. I don't know when even if the defense's application -- I did ask for a proposed order because I don't --\n6\nMS. MENNINGER: It was sent, your Honor.\n7\nTHE COURT: I mean, the question is, to what end.\n8\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes. Why don't we see about the conferral, we'll see how that process goes and maybe it won't be an issue, your Honor.\n9\nTHE COURT: You'll confer on that. I don't know if there is a conferral to be had on the Kelly issue, because I'm going to spend my remaining lunch hour looking at this material. Seems to me, best case scenario is if I agree with\n10\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014271",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 165 of 197 2706 LCHCmax5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1\nTHE COURT: Well, you'll discuss it and when I come back, you'll tell me, both sides, what the application is.\nWhat do we have after lunch?\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think we would like to use the lunch break to hammer out the final stipulations. If\nwe can have extra time to get that done, I think that's going to be it, is the reading of the stipulations. There are some documents, but these are things we have to go through over the break.\nTHE COURT: So basically no other defense witnesses are available today following stips. And then the open question, is the defense seeking to have potentially this rebuttal, rebuttal, rebuttal on points, the witness regarding timing of residence on Monday. I don't know when even if the defense's application -- I did ask for a proposed order because I don't --\nMS. MENNINGER: It was sent, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I mean, the question is, to what end.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes. Why don't we see about the conferral, we'll see how that process goes and maybe it won't be an issue, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: You'll confer on that. I don't know if there is a conferral to be had on the Kelly issue, because I'm going to spend my remaining lunch hour looking at this material. Seems to me, best case scenario is if I agree with",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014271",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "Monday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014271"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}