mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014322.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "18",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 95 2756 LCI1MAX1\n1 THE COURT: Okay. Have we made it to 17?\n2 MR. EVERDELL: We've made it to 19, in fact.\n3 THE COURT: 19. Wow. Progress.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Page 19 is the next one, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n6 MR. EVERDELL: First, on line 5, there's another \"or foreign,\" which we can omit.\n7\n8 THE COURT: Okay. Let me just look.\n9 Yeah. Okay.\n10 MR. ROHRBACH: It would need to be ellipses since this is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government.\n11\n12 THE COURT: So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will read, \"Travel in interstate... commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign\" and replacing with the ellipses.\n13\n14\n15 Okay. Next page.\n16 MR. EVERDELL: Same page, your Honor, line 4.\n17 Don't worry. I tried to be efficient about this.\n18 We'll go quickly.\n19 THE COURT: That's fine.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Line 4. There is the inclusion of the statutory text \"or coerces,\" and since we don't have any evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it read \"knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any individual.\"\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25 THE COURT: Or in brackets.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014322",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 95 2756 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Okay. Have we made it to 17?\n2 MR. EVERDELL: We've made it to 19, in fact.\n3 THE COURT: 19. Wow. Progress.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Page 19 is the next one, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n6 MR. EVERDELL: First, on line 5, there's another \"or foreign,\" which we can omit.\n7\n8 THE COURT: Okay. Let me just look.\n9 Yeah. Okay.\n10 MR. ROHRBACH: It would need to be ellipses since this is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government.\n11\n12 THE COURT: So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will read, \"Travel in interstate... commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign\" and replacing with the ellipses.\n13\n14\n15 Okay. Next page.\n16 MR. EVERDELL: Same page, your Honor, line 4.\n17 Don't worry. I tried to be efficient about this.\n18 We'll go quickly.\n19 THE COURT: That's fine.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Line 4. There is the inclusion of the statutory text \"or coerces,\" and since we don't have any evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it read \"knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any individual.\"\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25 THE COURT: Or in brackets.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014322",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014322"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}