mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014327.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 95 2761 LCI1MAX1\n1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and\n2 I'll add, \"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,\" for the reason indicated. Because the\n3 conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count\n4 for the object of the conspiracy.\n5\n6 I won't adopt the requested change within the\n7 statement of the elements.\n8\n9 Anything else on page 20?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another \"or foreign\" that we need to omit.\n11\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with\n13 \"Second,\" cutting \"or foreign.\" Okay.\n14\n15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the\n16 Court but we would propose replacing \"an individual\" with the\n17 word \"Jane.\" On line 5, there is \"or foreign,\" which should be\n18 omitted.\n19\n20 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, \"to travel in interstate commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign.\"\n21\n22 Okay.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our\n24 objection to the word \"coerced.\" I understand that's been\n25 overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014327",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 95 2761 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and\n2 I'll add, \"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,\" for the reason indicated. Because the\n3 conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count\n4 for the object of the conspiracy.\n5\n6 I won't adopt the requested change within the\n7 statement of the elements.\n8\n9 Anything else on page 20?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another \"or foreign\" that we need to omit.\n11\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with\n13 \"Second,\" cutting \"or foreign.\" Okay.\n14\n15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the\n16 Court but we would propose replacing \"an individual\" with the\n17 word \"Jane.\" On line 5, there is \"or foreign,\" which should be\n18 omitted.\n19\n20 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, \"to travel in interstate commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign.\"\n21\n22 Okay.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our\n24 objection to the word \"coerced.\" I understand that's been\n25 overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014327",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "1994",
      "1997",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014327",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}